![]() |
|
|
#155 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
Well, I finished filling in all the odd-shaped gaps about an hour and a half ago, so now the only outstanding ranges are as follows:
Code:
350G-384G IN PROGRESS (IronBits) 418G-427G AVAILABLE 439G-460G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek) 473G-495G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek) 523G-546G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek)
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3·7·53 Posts |
I can put it on after the 350G-384G that will finish in about 6 hrs.
418-427 reserved |
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
111310 Posts |
350G-384G Completed, sent to Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3·7·53 Posts |
418-427 Completed, sent to Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23·3·5·72 Posts |
Code:
439G-460G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek) 473G-495G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek) 523G-546G IN PROGRESS (Mini-Geek) |
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
Sep 2004
1011000011102 Posts |
I can spare my quad-core to help....
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Let's not press too hard here. We want to finish efforts but we also should allow people a fair amount of time to finish what they reserved.
I think Mini-Geek will let us know if he needs or wants help. On or after April 1st when sieving k=300-400 for n=600K-1M is finished, I'll have at least 3 cores available for LLRing this effort. |
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Okay, great! We won't be needing any more help with the sieving, since Mini-Geek shouldn't have a problem finishing his ranges (he's finished all his other ranges for this effort pretty quickly)>
However, the LLR effort will need a lot of help, so you are more than welcome to help there. ![]() One quick question though: is your quad-core overclocked? If so, then you'll need to run a Prime95/mprime stress test on it for a few hours to verify that you can produce good results--for a doublecheck effort like this with no first-pass residuals to compare with, it is crucial that our machines produce perfect results. In fact, everyone who wants to participate in this effort's LLR portion should do a stress test on their machine first (overclocked or no) just to play it safe. I myself will be doing a stress test on my machine before doing any doublecheck LLR, even though I am very confident in my machine's results.
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
102538 Posts |
I'm back. 439-460 is complete, and 473-495 only has 1.3G remaining. Sending factors now. ~8.2G left total per core, should take a little over 24 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is more sieving power needed? | jasong | jasong | 4 | 2012-03-25 19:11 |
| Doublecheck always have shifted S0 value? | ATH | PrimeNet | 11 | 2010-06-03 06:38 |
| All things doublecheck!! | masser | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 44 | 2006-09-24 17:19 |
| DoubleCheck vs LL assignments | Unregistered | PrimeNet | 9 | 2006-03-26 05:48 |
| doublecheck - results | TheJudger | Data | 4 | 2005-04-04 08:54 |