![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2004
New York City
10000100010112 Posts |
A dartboard contains regions with point values in the following list:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, 21,22,24,25,26,27,28,30,32,33,34,36,38,39,40,42,45, 48,50,51,54,57,60 Suppose you want to reach exactly N=100 points, and that each dart toss must hit a different valued region. How many different ways are there of doing this? In other words, how many partitions of N=100 into sums of numbers in the above list without repetition are there? For what value of N does this function peak? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
How many darts are you allowed to throw?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2004
New York City
108B16 Posts |
You can throw any number up to the number (43) of
different valued regions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
Quote:
1/[(1-x)(2-x)(3-x)(4-x)............(60-x)] I would not want to do this by hand. Use a SAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Oct 2007
Manchester, UK
23×59 Posts |
248990?
I'm a little unsure of whether SAP is an accronym that stands for something, or a derogatory term for someone who will actually spend their time calculating the answer. I certainly hope it isn't the latter. I whipped up some PARI code to work this out, but only went up to 13 darts, because the 14th triangular number is over 100. My code takes 20 seconds to come to that answer. Last fiddled with by lavalamp on 2008-02-08 at 18:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·11·283 Posts |
For N=100 I get: partitions=258949
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·11·283 Posts |
Oops, I just saw the second part of the post.
Since the maximal total is 1072, the function should peak at half, N=536 with partitions=35458209440. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Oct 2007
Manchester, UK
25158 Posts |
Ah, somehow I'd missed out number 39 from my list of possible numbers, I also now get 258,949.
As a possible expansion to this problem then, what if the limitation is just a max of one dart per area rather than a max of one dart per score. For example, it's possible to score 6 in three different ways, single 6, double 3, triple 2. Also, or perhaps instead, what if it was extended to include quadruple and quintuple numbers on the (presumably very large) board. A third expansion might be a board with more or fewer numbers on it. Edit: I decided I'd run some code to count all combinations for n=100 with the first expansion (one dart per area, rather than one per score). The code took a _lot_ longer to run (80 minutes up from 20 seconds), and it counted 75,097,688. Last fiddled with by lavalamp on 2008-02-09 at 02:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2×11×283 Posts |
Quote:
[edit]For all area scores (62 areas will bullseye) I get 82339371 for N=100[/edit] Last fiddled with by retina on 2008-02-09 at 04:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
|
|
|
|