24 hour rally - Page 15

mdettweiler · 2008-02-17, 21:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

I know everything that happens here...ok...almost everything.

Ah, I see.

Hey Gary, did you really tell Carlos about the "secret weapon" machines, or is he bluffing?

em99010pepe · 2008-02-18, 22:59

So let's schedule a 24 hour rally starting on Feb 23 7 pm GMT port 100 of the LLRserver?

BTW, I don't bluff...

mdettweiler · 2008-02-18, 23:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

So let's schedule a 24 hour rally starting on Feb 23 7 pm GMT port 100 of the LLRserver?

Okay, sounds good.

I'm hoping to bring the following (at least) to the rally:
-2.2Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, both cores
-1Ghz Intel Pentium 3
-(possibly) 550Mhz Intel Pentium 3

I say "hoping" because of what happened last time. Not that I'm planning to miss the rally this time, though.

mdettweiler · 2008-02-18, 23:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

...

BTW, I don't bluff...

Ah, I see.

Gary, why'd you tell him? Now he's going to go tell all of the Free-DC people about it so they'll match the power!

em99010pepe · 2008-02-18, 23:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Okay, sounds good.

I'm hoping to bring the following (at least) to the rally:
-2.2Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, both cores
-1Ghz Intel Pentium 3
-(possibly) 550Mhz Intel Pentium 3

I say "hoping" because of what happened last time. Not that I'm planning to miss the rally this time, though.

Again this kind of talk? You

too much. Added one core to port 100, more to come.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Ah, I see.

Gary, why'd you tell him? Now he's going to go tell all of the Free-DC people about it so they'll match the power!

Just a little bench if I am right about Gary's machines, my quady is equivalent to 10 of his machines.
By looking at the LLRnet stats Free-DC is starting to get away from second spot team.

mdettweiler · 2008-02-18, 23:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Just a little bench if I am right about Gary's machines, my quady is equivalent to 10 of his machines.
By looking at the LLRnet stats Free-DC is starting to get away from second spot team.

Ooh, I guess that means that your two quad-cores equal his 20 machines!

And then if you add Beyond's 6 quad-cores on top of that...not a pretty sight for the "no team" team.

em99010pepe · 2008-02-18, 23:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Ooh, I guess that means that your two quad-cores equal his 20 machines!

And then if you add Beyond's 6 quad-cores on top of that...not a pretty sight for the "no team" team.

Who said I have two quad-cores? Who said Beyond has 6 quad-cores?

gd_barnes · 2008-02-18, 23:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Ah, so Gary told you, too?

lol, YOU told him Anon. It was either in one of the threads or in a PM that we were all exchanging I believe. And if you hadn't already, you just did.

Free-DC is talking trash here. I may have to pull out the even heavier artillery. 20 machines is nothing. As for a quad equalling 10 of mine, what about that 'false 4th core' that just doesn't seem to be able to utilize the resources properly? I can believe 7-8 but not 10.

em99010pepe · 2008-02-18, 23:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Free-DC is talking trash here. I may have to pull out the even heavier artillery. 20 machines is nothing. As for a quad equalling 10 of mine, what about that 'false 4th core' that just doesn't seem to be able to utilize the resources properly? I can believe 7-8 but not 10.

Depends on the FFT length, for now it's smaller so the 4th core can still keep the pace.

mdettweiler · 2008-02-18, 23:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

lol, YOU told him Anon. It was either in one of the threads or in a PM that we were all exchanging I believe. And if you hadn't already, you just did.

I did? Oh, that must have been before we started doing teams at NPLB, so it would have seemed perfectly harmless at the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Free-DC is talking trash here. I may have to pull out the even heavier artillery. 20 machines is nothing. As for a quad equalling 10 of mine, what about that 'false 4th core' that just doesn't seem to be able to utilize the resources properly? I can believe 7-8 but not 10.

The 'false 4th core' doesn't really make that big a difference, I think, for numbers the size we're doing--am I correct, Carlos? (Edit: never mind, Carlos just confirmed this in a separate post that he made while I was writing this post.)

As for pulling out the heavy artillery--Gary, you need a quad-core! (Hey, the new AMD Phenoms--which are true quad-cores, unlike the Core 2 Quads--are getting pretty cheap now, and that's driven down the price of the Intel quads, too. You might want to check it out.)

em99010pepe · 2008-02-18, 23:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

As for pulling out the heavy artillery--Gary, you need a quad-core! (Hey, the new AMD Phenoms--which are true quad-cores, unlike the Core 2 Quads--are getting pretty cheap now, and that's driven down the price of the Intel quads, too. You might want to check it out.)

I think the AMD's are poor on overclocking, at least that was what I've been reading on different forums.

Just received an interesting private message from Beyond, you guys should take a look on the stats next Wed or Thursday. lol

2008-02-18, 22:59	#156
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2830₁₀ Posts	So let's schedule a 24 hour rally starting on Feb 23 7 pm GMT port 100 of the LLRserver? BTW, I don't bluff... Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-02-18 at 23:03

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
24 hour news	davieddy	Soap Box	4	2011-12-19 19:35
mfaktc slows on WinXP after about an hour	Christenson	GPU Computing	5	2011-05-27 21:47
Prime 95 shuts down itself after exactly 9:22 hour	Unregistered	Information & Answers	13	2009-09-02 05:11
! hour limit on editing	davieddy	Lounge	7	2009-09-01 15:57
1 buck an hour	crash893	Hardware	6	2009-06-18 01:45