CRUS LLRnet server discussion - Page 10

em99010pepe · 2008-01-22, 23:28

I'm still getting results but not rejected ones...

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 00:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

I'm still getting results but not rejected ones...

What precisely do you mean by "rejected results"?

em99010pepe · 2008-01-23, 04:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

We are running to fast....
This is what I am going to do:

1º - Wait to receive all rejected files and put them again into the server.
2º - After testing the previous numbers I'll change the Riesel Server port to 444 and add kar_bon's file.
3º - Start Sierp server on port 443.

Goodnight.

Done..Servers up and running...

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 06:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

Done..Servers up and running...

Cool! I'm going to get LLRnet started up on both cores, running the Riesel server now, to clean up the last of the doublechecks.

BTW Carlos, would it be OK if I posted the "official" LLRnet announcement thread soon, or would you still rather that I wait for the power supply upgrade? Either way's fine with me.

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 06:33

Wow, Karsten's doublechecks are so small that it actually takes longer for LLRnet to get/report the numbers than it does to crunch them! Thus, LLRnet is only using short, small bursts of CPU power.

So, I can clean up the doublechecks, and run my reserved Sierp. Base 6 k's at the same time (since otherwise most of my CPU power would be wasted due to LLRnet overhead)!

I hope I'm not hitting your network too hard, Carlos!

kar_bon · 2008-01-23, 06:49

Code:

Working on : 64620/419784 (1300000000000:P:1:16:257)
Only base 2 is supported, use PRP for other bases.
Successfully connected to server!
LOGGED ON
[01/23/08 07:45:44]
Result 64620/419784 succesfully sent to the server.

base 16!!!!!????? why???

ERROR!!!

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 07:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by kar_bon

Code:

Working on : 64620/419784 (1300000000000:P:1:16:257)
Only base 2 is supported, use PRP for other bases.
Successfully connected to server!
LOGGED ON
[01/23/08 07:45:44]
Result 64620/419784 succesfully sent to the server.

base 16!!!!!????? why???

ERROR!!!

Oh, whoops! Looks like I changed the n-values correctly, but forgot to change the NewPGen header line. (Got to fix the Perl script again...)

Karsten, can you please stop crunching for the Sierp. server? Carlos, could you please delete out the results file, joblist file, and knpairs file (after shutting down the server of course) for the Sierp. server, the put the Sierp. file I posted in there afresh, making sure to edit the part of the file's header that says "16" to say "2"? The numbers really are base 2 numbers, but the file is set so that they are treated as base 16.

Thanks for catching that, Karsten!

em99010pepe · 2008-01-23, 07:29

done

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 07:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

done

Thanks!

Oh, BTW, after running a LOT of numbers for the Riesel server on my computer, I'm thinking that's enough doublechecking for now.

(I hadn't realized how big the file was until now! It has almost 10,000 candidates in it, spread out all the way up to >900K!) Are there any checked-out tests for anyone other than me on the Riesel server right now? If not, then I'll cancel all of mine, so you can shut it down, send me the results, and feed in some REAL Riesel candidates!

mdettweiler · 2008-01-23, 07:42

Forgot to mention in my last post: Karsten, you can use the Sierp. server again, now that the problem's been fixed.

em99010pepe · 2008-01-23, 07:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

Thanks!

Oh, BTW, after running a LOT of numbers for the Riesel server on my computer, I'm thinking that's enough doublechecking for now.

(I hadn't realized how big the file was until now! It has almost 10,000 candidates in it, spread out all the way up to >900K!) Are there any checked-out tests for anyone other than me on the Riesel server right now? If not, then I'll cancel all of mine, so you can shut it down, send me the results, and feed in some REAL Riesel candidates!

Tnerual is still receiving work, let's wait until he shutdowns his clients.

2008-01-22, 23:28	#100
em99010pepe Sep 2004 101100001110₂ Posts	I'm still getting results but not rejected ones... Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-01-22 at 23:28

2008-01-23, 06:33	#104
mdettweiler A Sunny Moo Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 3×2,083 Posts	Wow, Karsten's doublechecks are so small that it actually takes longer for LLRnet to get/report the numbers than it does to crunch them! Thus, LLRnet is only using short, small bursts of CPU power. So, I can clean up the doublechecks, and run my reserved Sierp. Base 6 k's at the same time (since otherwise most of my CPU power would be wasted due to LLRnet overhead)! I hope I'm not hitting your network too hard, Carlos! Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-01-23 at 06:34

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
discontinuation of the LLRNet server	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	1	2009-09-07 19:13
LLRnet servers for CRUS	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	39	2008-07-15 10:26
NPLB LLRnet server discussion	em99010pepe	No Prime Left Behind	229	2008-04-30 19:13
New LLRnet servers discussion	IronBits	Conjectures 'R Us	11	2008-03-20 03:43
llrnet server down?	Molnar	Prime Sierpinski Project	4	2006-10-19 14:32

2008-01-23, 07:29	#107
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	done

2008-01-23, 07:42	#109
mdettweiler A Sunny Moo Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 1869₁₆ Posts	Forgot to mention in my last post: Karsten, you can use the Sierp. server again, now that the problem's been fixed.