![]() |
|
|
#518 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Quote:
He he. My estimate posts create headaches for many folks. Math is fun! My estimates of times to complete ranges at CRUS get even worse. I won't go there. The problem is that people will sometimes reserve 50-100 CPU years of work and won't even realize it thinking that they can complete it in a few months on their single quad! lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#519 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
16FE16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#520 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101011012 Posts |
Quote:
It isn't easy. You have to remember that the testing times vary by the square of the exponent. n=200K takes 4 times as long to test as n=100K. Also, the k's remaining reduce at a reverse logarithmic rate (or a reverse compound-interest rate; not sure what the correct term really is there). That is at n=10K, there might be 48 k's remaining and at n=20K, there might be 36 k's remaining; which means that there is a 25% reduction in k's remaining for each doubling of the n-value. Therefore, the estimate is that you should have 36*.75=27 k's remaining at n=40K. Since I put some of those estimates up, I realized that there is a slight error in my calculations: The k's remaining do NOT reduce at a reverse logarithmic rate because the average weight of the final few k's is much lower than previous k's. I do not know the proper way to make such an adjustment. Using the above situation with 36 k's remaining at n=20K, it could be that the estimate should be that there should be 29 k's remaining at n=40K but that is only a guess. Still, using the above estimate gives the least amount of time that it SHOULD take. It gives a general idea of the amount of work reserved. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#521 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
22·727 Posts |
my 2 cent :-)
last days pairs submitted to all server: 2008-11-25: 13427 2008-11-26: 13809 2008-11-27: 14163 2008-11-28: 15093 2008-11-29: 15169 2008-11-30: 14953 there're about 320,000 pairs remain (in server-pool or not reserved yet). so with about 15,000 pairs per day we have 21 days left! |
|
|
|
|
#522 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2008-12-02 at 10:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#523 |
|
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
575.2K-576K is 50 % completed.
I think today I'll receive a quad-core for my work....hehehe |
|
|
|
|
#524 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#525 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
588610 Posts |
what pc has Wabbit98 got on port 400
he is only managing 1 or 2 pairs an hour i would guess he is puting an old amd to use ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#526 |
|
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
Is it possible to put more work available?
|
|
|
|
|
#527 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#528 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 10 | 2021-03-13 22:32 |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |