|
2008-11-20, 03:30
|
#474 | |
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
1011001001002 Posts |
Quote:
Doing LLRNET only, would definately put me to sleep. Ian (MyDog) |
|
|
|
2008-11-20, 13:39
|
#475 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
You could always do manual Drive 1 work instead of LLRnet drive 1 work.
|
|
|
|
2008-11-20, 14:22
|
#476 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Quote:
That would be just as boring. It's still only one kind of search effort. I like a little more variety. For instance, right now I'm running k=303 & 309 for n>600K (actually at n=~900K now) from the individual-k drive, k=147 for Max, as well as Riesel base 256 and Sierp base 12 over at CRUS with Sierp base 31 occassionally running on my laptop and desktop in between some misc. stuff I'm working on on those slower machines. Most recently I had 4 quads running k=47 and 53 to n=1M until that was done after completing a double-check of Curtis's mini-drive for his 9 k's in our range up to n=500K. After the 1st drive is done, I'll likely pick up some double-check work for n=100K-260K and some k=1005-2000 work while leaving 2-4 machines running n>600K on one of our k=400-1001 for n=600K-1M drives (likely to be split up into 3 separate drives of k=400-600, 600-800, & 800-1001). I might even suggest that we do the same thing for k=1005-2000 that we did for k=300-1001 before it reached top-5000 range...that is, have 2 drives...one for top-5000 work starting at n=~350K and one to fill in the holes starting at n=50K and bringing it quickly up to n=350K. Variety is the spice of life and we'll have plenty of it after this drive is done!  Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-11-20 at 14:23 |
|
|
|
2008-11-20, 18:44
|
#477 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
LLRnet IB400 has completed 544K-547K and 547.7K-550K, results emailed to Gary.
(Sorry I was a little late on this.)
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-11-20 at 18:45 |
|
|
|
2008-11-22, 10:51
|
#478 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242558 Posts |
Reserving 560K-567K for port 400.
|
|
|
|
2008-11-22, 19:46
|
#479 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Taking 575.0-575.2
|
|
|
|
2008-11-24, 22:19
|
#480 |
Sep 2004
B0E16 Posts |
Taking 575.2-576.0. (for me)
Just tired of caching work from C443 to test it with the manual client...lol Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-11-24 at 22:26 |
|
|
|
2008-11-25, 17:06
|
#481 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
624910 Posts |
LLRnet IB400 has completed 550.7K-555.0K, results emailed to Gary.
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25, 22:38
|
#482 |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
So 36 days to complete Drive 1, can we do it?
Carlos |
|
|
|
2008-11-25, 22:51
|
#483 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Ian has reported completion of the n=550K-550.7K range and sent results to me.
|
|
|
|
2008-11-25, 23:34
|
#484 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Taking 576.0 - 577.0
I have 2 K's and another large range set to complete in < 6 days Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2008-11-25 at 23:35 |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 10 | 2021-03-13 22:32 |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |
