![]() |
|
|
#441 | |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#442 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
reserving n=547.7K to 550K for port 400
|
|
|
|
|
#443 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Taking 550.0 - 550.1
|
|
|
|
|
#444 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
I'm in the process of moving cores from Base 5 to here. I will put them on port 400 for now, until I can determine what I REALLY want them to do over here.
9 cores total (all 2.4 ghz), but it will take me awhile to empty the queues on some. I have more cores remaining on Base 5 doing manual work. Haven't determined what I will do with them yet either. If anyone has any suggestions as to where to utilize them, fire away. Hope this helps. Maybe we can beat yearend for this drive. |
|
|
|
|
#445 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Quote:
I'd suggest putting them all on this drive. Manual ranges or LLRnet...it doesn't matter. I'm hoping 2 LLRnet rallies by year end will get us there. At the current pace, we're looking at mid-late Jan. I think. I added an 8th quad to port 400 yesterday for at least a couple of days to boost it a little. Thanks for asking and for your contribution! Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#446 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
1011001001002 Posts |
Quote:
Taking 550.1 - 550.7 Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2008-11-13 at 03:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
#447 |
|
Sep 2004
54168 Posts |
I think we are averaging 10 000 candidates per day on llrnet.
Mini-Geek and MyDogBuster, how much per day do you guys do with the manual client? Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#448 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#449 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
) per day. I run ~42.37 times slower than LLRnet, I run about 2.36% of NPLB's drive 1 work. With ~42 more dual core Athlons I'd match the rest of NPLB's drive 1 work (in reality, knowing Athlons LLR much slower than Intels, I wouldn't do that, but in theory that's about right).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#450 |
|
Apprentice Crank
Mar 2006
2·227 Posts |
I don't know whether this is even worth posting, but could you manually remove the first few candidates from the n=550.9K file? I had access to a relatively fast machine for a short time, and I used it to take a random shot at the top 5000 prime list. Unfortunately, I won't have access to the machine for quite a while, so I won't be able to complete the range. Anyway, the results are:
459*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 476D81B8AB93B4E6 Time : 400.233 sec. 475*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 0CF593645470C446 Time : 409.060 sec. 487*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: CE7B8C7C22E1E74A Time : 407.048 sec. 607*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 987FBCF57CD7E716 Time : 410.726 sec. 627*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 7755B1BC5359A82D Time : 408.789 sec. 649*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 78B2F9D69197D8E4 Time : 409.356 sec. 789*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: C5617FE2C5D2A6E6 Time : 408.604 sec. 799*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 483A5C4A77086371 Time : 407.735 sec. 805*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EF6B7030B1EC76BA Time : 412.297 sec. 837*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 89055F28C68B79AB Time : 407.490 sec. 855*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 1FC9A2892D6C0D96 Time : 408.525 sec. 927*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: F8D6E1C467078C97 Time : 408.293 sec. 551*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 2E8104B214C5ABCB Time : 417.207 sec. 555*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: A9612EE36990BF2B Time : 420.103 sec. 585*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: A46D22E34D606B12 Time : 422.803 sec. 705*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 47A848A02CEFE25B Time : 415.925 sec. 815*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 496DB2639B7305C3 Time : 412.998 sec. 887*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EB76B9FE9C148B7D Time : 411.161 sec. 893*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EE5D9B1942FF4621 Time : 410.030 sec. 511*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 8BF7E5C25FAD71A3 Time : 408.932 sec. 553*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 19F3F2F8A8AFEA43 Time : 407.125 sec. 559*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: DD199F0D0B977CED Time : 411.822 sec. |
|
|
|
|
#451 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
542.0-542.6 is complete. lresults attached. Two primes found, already reported.
Estimate for 547.1-547.3 is 11/24. Estimate for full 547.1-547.7 range is 12/16. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 10 | 2021-03-13 22:32 |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |