Team drive #1: k=400-1001 n=333.2K-600K - Page 25

gd_barnes · 2008-05-22, 09:09

I have now verified all drive 1 results for n=400K-420K. In doing so, I checked the primes found vs. post 1 in this thread, the 300<k<2000 page, the NPLB drive 1 page, the PrimeSearch site, and the top-5000 site.

Nothing was omitted from the top-5000 site and I have now completed ranges and posted the primes that I could on the Primesearch site, i.e. primes that were within ranges that we were able to reserve before others did, which was most of them.

Discrepencies on other listings were as follows:

1. Recently reported 813*2^406850-1 was not listed in post 1 nor on the 300<k<2000 page. I've now updated post 1.

2. In addition to the prime in #1, there are still 8 more primes for n=417K-420K to show on the 300<k<2000 page.

3. All 21 new and 3 confirmed primes for n=400K-410K as well as 799*2^418739-1 need to be shown on the NPLB drive 1 page.

Karsten, attached is a spreadsheet showing the remainder of what needs to be posted on the 300<k<2000 page and the NPLB drive 1 page.

I have now reserved n=440K-460K for all k-values that I could at PrimeSearch. n=420K-440K had already been previously reserved.

*****

In other results news, over the weekend after I finish testing n=423K-424K for drive 3, I'll start verifying results and primes for n=420K-480K for that drive.

We are quickly filling up all the remaining ranges at the Primesearch site!

Gary

Mini-Geek · 2008-05-22, 11:14

435.0-435.1 and 435.5-435.6 complete, no primes. As long as no one minds, I think I'm just going to wait until I finish 435.0-436.0 then post both full, original lresults files, instead of how I've been doing it.

mdettweiler · 2008-05-22, 16:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

We are quickly filling up all the remaining ranges at the Primesearch site!

This got me thinking: what do we plan on doing when we proceed past n=600K? Do we plan to ask Mike Hartley to extend the PrimeSearch range to n=1M or higher?

gd_barnes · 2008-05-22, 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

This got me thinking: what do we plan on doing when we proceed past n=600K? Do we plan to ask Mike Hartley to extend the PrimeSearch range to n=1M or higher?

I'm not going to request it. To be quite honest, it's EXTREMELY time-consuming to reserve, complete, and verify ranges there and I'm not too fond of it anymore. It took me well over 2 hours last night just to report all of the n=400K-420K primes and complete all of the ranges and then reserve all of the n=440K-460K ranges and it's very easy to mess up.

The problem is that there is no way to make the site show a specific n-range for all k-values. You can do it in blocks of 5-xxx k's but if any one of those k-values has a lower incompleted range, it won't show the higher range that you need to reserve and you have to go to the individual k-value. It's very prone to error. And then there's all of the missing primes on completed ranges, which is going to be a big hassle.

I'd just as soon not worry about reporting them there past n=600K. With Karsten's 300<k<2000 page, it's just a duplication of effort.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-05-22, 17:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

435.0-435.1 and 435.5-435.6 complete, no primes. As long as no one minds, I think I'm just going to wait until I finish 435.0-436.0 then post both full, original lresults files, instead of how I've been doing it.

That works for me.

Mini-Geek · 2008-05-22, 19:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I'm not going to request it. To be quite honest, it's EXTREMELY time-consuming to reserve, complete, and verify ranges there and I'm not too fond of it anymore. It took me well over 2 hours last night just to report all of the n=400K-420K primes and complete all of the ranges and then reserve all of the n=440K-460K ranges and it's very easy to mess up.

The problem is that there is no way to make the site show a specific n-range for all k-values. You can do it in blocks of 5-xxx k's but if any one of those k-values has a lower incompleted range, it won't show the higher range that you need to reserve and you have to go to the individual k-value. It's very prone to error. And then there's all of the missing primes on completed ranges, which is going to be a big hassle.

I'd just as soon not worry about reporting them there past n=600K. With Karsten's 300<k<2000 page, it's just a duplication of effort.

Gary

So once we get past 600K are we going to continue reporting primes as PrimeSearch even though we're not really part of it any more? If not, are we going to get our own project name and have to work our way up the stats again (or are we going to move NPLB primes from PrimeSearch to NPLB somehow)?

mdettweiler · 2008-05-22, 20:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

So once we get past 600K are we going to continue reporting primes as PrimeSearch even though we're not really part of it any more? If not, are we going to get our own project name and have to work our way up the stats again (or are we going to move NPLB primes from PrimeSearch to NPLB somehow)?

I think the plan is that our project will remain part of PrimeSearch, just that all reservations (team-drive or individual-reservation) for n>600K will be handled through the NPLB forum rather than through the PrimeSearch site (as already a few k's are for 300<k<400).

gd_barnes · 2008-05-23, 04:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous

I think the plan is that our project will remain part of PrimeSearch, just that all reservations (team-drive or individual-reservation) for n>600K will be handled through the NPLB forum rather than through the PrimeSearch site (as already a few k's are for 300<k<400).

Yep, that's it. Karsten will maintain the ranges and primes on the Rieselprime.org 300<k<2000 page for n>600K and that will be it. No more duplication of record keeping.

We'll maintain the project name of Primesearch at the top-5000 site. There's no use to start over on stats and the such.

I toyed with the idea of having this be a new top-5000 project but I didn't want to ruffle feathers related to the k=300-1001 range. If I had done that, it would be like our project pilfering the Primesearch site, which wouldn't have been quite right.

Gary

Lennart · 2008-05-24, 10:11

I reserve n=455k-456k
For the rally

/Lennart

gd_barnes · 2008-05-24, 10:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lennart

I reserve n=455k-456k
For the rally

/Lennart

Hold off just a minute. I'm sending you n=455K-458K by PM shortly. That should last the duration of the rally for all of your cores. (34000+ k/n pairs)

Gary

gd_barnes · 2008-05-24, 10:23

n=455K-458K has now been sent to Lennart for the rally.

I've now requested that Ironbits set up port 400 for the rally and have sent him n=458K-463K to load into it.

More manual files to be posted shortly...

Gary

2008-05-24, 10:11	#273
Lennart "Lennart" Jun 2007 2⁵·5·7 Posts	Reserving I reserve n=455k-456k For the rally /Lennart

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Team drive #14: k=600-1001 n=1M-2M	mdettweiler	No Prime Left Behind	10	2021-03-13 22:32
Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	127	2011-07-15 14:25
Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	89	2011-03-10 12:34
Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	135	2010-11-23 14:27
Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	38	2008-10-22 16:20

2008-05-22, 11:14	#266
Mini-Geek Account Deleted "Tim Sorbera" Aug 2006 San Antonio, TX USA 4267₁₀ Posts	435.0-435.1 and 435.5-435.6 complete, no primes. As long as no one minds, I think I'm just going to wait until I finish 435.0-436.0 then post both full, original lresults files, instead of how I've been doing it.

2008-05-24, 10:23	#275
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 24255₈ Posts	n=455K-458K has now been sent to Lennart for the rally. I've now requested that Ironbits set up port 400 for the rally and have sent him n=458K-463K to load into it. More manual files to be posted shortly... Gary