![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
Jun 2003
22·61 Posts |
I was not aware that I needed to post the residues anywhere. By a quick run through of the posts here it didnt appear it was common procedure to save and email the residues. With that being said I no longer have any of the residues. Deleted them last week :(. Sorry.
I can re-run these, but obviously it would take a while. If that is what you guys would like me to do can you repost the input file(s) for 210-216. Last fiddled with by antiroach on 2010-04-19 at 16:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
Another example of this would be unconnected's range a little earlier on this drive that he did with Prime95. Prime95 does PRP tests, not LLR tests, on these numbers (the latter is preferred since it gives a definite primality proof right off the bat; LLR tests only work for base 2, but since base 16 can be converted to base 2 we do LLR tests on it was well). However, PRP and LLR residuals are not compatible, so you could say that the PRP residuals are "half-useless" for doublechecking (they can't be compared with LLR residuals, though we could just make a note of it and doublecheck that range with PRP tests, so they're not entirely useless). In his case, like this one, it wasn't worth the trouble of re-testing the entire range just to get LLR residuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Jun 2003
22×61 Posts |
Gotcha thanks for the info. I guess this'll teach me to keep results around for a longer period of time than a week :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Reserving 216-220
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=96630
6852*16^216571-1 or 1713*2^866286-1 is prime Only 21k's left Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2010-11-30 at 18:06 Reason: moved to the R16 drive thread (FYI: drive primes should go in their respective threads) |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
R16 216K-220K complete
1 prime previously reported Results emailed |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28A316 Posts |
A file has been posted for n=220K-250K. All k's with primes have been removed. In a manner similar to base 6, please cut your reservations out of the file in multiples of n=2K.
The file has been sieved for n=200K-500K and the sieve depth is P=12T. More sieving will be needed for n>250K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
Reserving 220K-230K.
I'm going to run the Riesel and Sierp sides for this n range simultaneously. I should start within a day or two, and I estimate it will take 23.6 days. ETA middle of January. Expected primes: 0.48. Chance of at least one prime: 38% |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
426710 Posts |
Reserving 230K-240K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
33863*16^236436-1=33863*2^945744-1 is prime! (284702 digits)
This was the largest remaining k, and (probably) the second-highest-weight Riesel k. This was waiting for me just past where I paused for the NPLB rally. Sure makes up for finding no primes in the rally.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 6 - team drive #4 - EIGHT OR BUST! | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 401 | 2015-05-27 15:15 |
| Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 146 | 2011-04-20 05:12 |
| Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=1M-2M | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 40 | 2011-01-22 08:10 |
| Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=150K-1M | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 27 | 2009-10-08 21:49 |
| Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 199 | 2009-09-30 18:44 |