![]() |
|
|
#331 |
|
Jun 2009
22×32×19 Posts |
I compared the files and found mine to have less candidates. Now that I think about it I seem to remember I sieved to p=700T (only for k=9519). Unfortunately I didn't keep the records as I decided that was as high as I would ever sieve this range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
24416 Posts |
Hi,
Here is my status today : k = 23451 is tested up to n = 3,136,472 base two, no prime, continuing... k = 60849 is tested up to n = 3,000,966 base two, no prime, continuing... Regards, Jean P.S. The two files are now sieved up to 413 T |
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22×5×29 Posts |
09/06/2014, 11H30
Success at last! I found : 60849*2^3067914+1 is prime! Time : 11623.254 sec. Primality Testing of k*b^n+/-1 Program - PC/MacIntel Version 3.8.8 (Linux llr64) I verified : 60849*2^3067914+1 is prime! (923539 decimal digits) Time : 9139.041 sec. Primality Testing of k*b^n+/-1 Program - beta Version 3.8.13 (Linux llr64) CPU Information: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor CPU speed: 3411.23 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB So, for now, this conjecture has one k remaining : k=23451 is tested up to n = 3213008 base 2, no prime, continuing... The corresponding files are sieved up to 446.6 T Indeed, I shall send the positive result to Chris Caldwell. Best Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2,593 Posts |
Congratulations! Almost 1M-digit prime!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101000112 Posts |
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
Great find!
Which of the two k has a higher Proth weight? |
|
|
|
|
|
#337 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28A316 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#338 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
24416 Posts |
Thanks! Note that this is also a nice success for the Sierpinski base 4 project that was launched by Citrix in January 2005 : this project has now only 3 k's remaining! It means we are right to persever...
Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#339 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24·397 Posts |
Followup question for Jean. How many cores do you have PRP testing this conjecture?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22×5×29 Posts |
Quote:
one for the primality testing of 23451*4^n+1 and one for the testing of 60849*4^n+1. Two cores only, now! Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#341 | |
|
Jun 2003
2×7×113 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3913 | 2021-07-26 09:58 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1397 | 2021-07-25 07:07 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1691 | 2021-07-06 18:50 |