![]() |
|
|
#188 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
200K-210K is done. No primes. Results attached. I checked them myself, but a processing with the original sieve file would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
Reserving 210K-220K
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
210-220 complete - nothing found
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101000112 Posts |
A file has been posted for n=220K-250K. All k's with primes have been removed. In a manner similar to base 6, please cut your reservations out of the file in multiples of n=2K.
The file has been sieved for n=200K-500K and the sieve depth is P=12T. More sieving will be needed for n>250K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
Reserving 220K-230K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#193 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24·397 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10000101010112 Posts |
Do you mean me, specifically, or in general? I've got a personal PRPnet server for my own work, (so I do have a PRPnet server up that combines Riesel and Sierp) but I could definitely see the use of a public PRPnet server searching R16 and S16 combined. Perhaps it'd be too much administrative overhead to try to match ranges from both sides and then separate results.
Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2010-12-17 at 17:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#195 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
Quote:
Separating results would be easy, presuming one knows a little SQL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#196 | ||
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Regarding separating results, that's no problem. I don't actually use SQL to do it (though that would be another good way to do it); rather what I do is run the completed_tests.log files through my suite of results processing scripts, which includes a script for pulling out subsets of results files. In fact, I did exactly this not long ago for Gary's personal PRPnet server when he ran R28 and S28 simultaneously. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#197 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
I'd like to leave this open to the less-online folks also. Let's get both drives up to n=250K, sieve to an optimum depth for n=250K-500K, and then load a moderate-sized range into a PRPnet server to see what the response is. The response has been quite tepid for the PRPnet mini-drive that has included various bases in the 20s and now base 31 at sizes mostly comparable to this one.
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-12-17 at 21:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
#198 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
143208 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sierp base 6 - team drive #3 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 373 | 2014-06-11 21:31 |
| Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 146 | 2011-04-20 05:12 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 46 | 2009-10-26 18:19 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2009-03-06 08:41 |
| Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 170 | 2008-11-11 05:10 |