mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-03-18, 16:32   #188
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17·251 Posts
Default

200K-210K is done. No primes. Results attached. I checked them myself, but a processing with the original sieve file would be appreciated.
Attached Files
File Type: zip S16-200-210.zip (69.3 KB, 88 views)
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-02, 06:22   #189
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

54448 Posts
Default Reserving

Reserving 210K-220K
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-15, 16:04   #190
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default

210-220 complete - nothing found
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 05:35   #191
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101000101000112 Posts
Default

A file has been posted for n=220K-250K. All k's with primes have been removed. In a manner similar to base 6, please cut your reservations out of the file in multiples of n=2K.

The file has been sieved for n=200K-500K and the sieve depth is P=12T. More sieving will be needed for n>250K.
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 13:49   #192
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17×251 Posts
Default

Reserving 220K-230K.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 15:26   #193
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

24·397 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Reserving 220K-230K.
Wouldn't it be best to get a PRPNet server up that combines both Riesel and Sierpinski sides?
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 17:09   #194
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

10000101010112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
Wouldn't it be best to get a PRPNet server up that combines both Riesel and Sierpinski sides?
Do you mean me, specifically, or in general? I've got a personal PRPnet server for my own work, (so I do have a PRPnet server up that combines Riesel and Sierp) but I could definitely see the use of a public PRPnet server searching R16 and S16 combined. Perhaps it'd be too much administrative overhead to try to match ranges from both sides and then separate results.

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2010-12-17 at 17:11
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 17:17   #195
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

24×397 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Do you mean me, specifically, or in general? I've got a personal PRPnet server for my own work, (so I do have a PRPnet server up that combines Riesel and Sierp) but I could definitely see the use of a public PRPnet server searching R16 and S16 combined. Perhaps it'd be too much administrative overhead to try to match ranges from both sides and then separate results.
A public one of course. They have one for NPLB, why not put a CRUS one that the same server.

Separating results would be easy, presuming one knows a little SQL.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 19:34   #196
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

186916 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Do you mean me, specifically, or in general? I've got a personal PRPnet server for my own work, (so I do have a PRPnet server up that combines Riesel and Sierp) but I could definitely see the use of a public PRPnet server searching R16 and S16 combined. Perhaps it'd be too much administrative overhead to try to match ranges from both sides and then separate results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
A public one of course. They have one for NPLB, why not put a CRUS one that the same server.

Separating results would be easy, presuming one knows a little SQL.
Indeed, I believe this has in fact been suggested before (over in the R31 PRPnet mini-drive thread, IIRC). If the interest is great enough, then I can quite easily set up a PRPnet server for base 16.

Regarding separating results, that's no problem. I don't actually use SQL to do it (though that would be another good way to do it); rather what I do is run the completed_tests.log files through my suite of results processing scripts, which includes a script for pulling out subsets of results files. In fact, I did exactly this not long ago for Gary's personal PRPnet server when he ran R28 and S28 simultaneously.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 21:14   #197
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

I'd like to leave this open to the less-online folks also. Let's get both drives up to n=250K, sieve to an optimum depth for n=250K-500K, and then load a moderate-sized range into a PRPnet server to see what the response is. The response has been quite tepid for the PRPnet mini-drive that has included various bases in the 20s and now base 31 at sizes mostly comparable to this one.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-12-17 at 21:14
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 21:52   #198
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

143208 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
I'd like to leave this open to the less-online folks also. Let's get both drives up to n=250K, sieve to an optimum depth for n=250K-500K, and then load a moderate-sized range into a PRPnet server to see what the response is. The response has been quite tepid for the PRPnet mini-drive that has included various bases in the 20s and now base 31 at sizes mostly comparable to this one.
I can understand that response would be tepid. There are not a lot of people who are interested in the CRUS project. I suspect that PrimeGrid would have no issue if someone from mersenneforum would promote a PRPNet server for CRUS over on their forum. It has already been done for NPLB and I think that the possibility of either proving a conjecture or finding a Top 5000 prime would bring a few other searchers over to CRUS.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierp base 6 - team drive #3 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 373 2014-06-11 21:31
Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 146 2011-04-20 05:12
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 46 2009-10-26 18:19
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 43 2009-03-06 08:41
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 170 2008-11-11 05:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:03.


Tue Jul 27 10:03:19 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 4:32, 0 users, load averages: 2.21, 1.93, 1.92

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.