![]() |
|
|
#287 |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2×3×7×23 Posts |
@ Gary: Well I has a feeling that it will be faster, but you are more experienced than I am, and with my quad (hopefully getting it tomorrow), I may consider to go to at least n=5,000. Actually the quad may be far from attacking and reenforcing the base 3 attack. At the moment I'm seriously considering to use 1 of the cores on sieveing the Base 19, actually preperation is already in progress, and currently I've begun using srsieve sieving from 10,001 to 250,000. I seriously consider running that range and reduce the amount of k's drasticly over the coming months. I know that I'm reserving loads of work at the moment, but at least this gives me a chance to contribute to something rather usefull. So hey please also sign me on this range: n>10000 > n =250000 for sierpinski base 19, all k's!
Thanks, and after sometime I think 2-3 month from now, this quad may be shipped to base 3 conjecture and to work with that one only, so we can consider this enrolement as praxis for the future and bigger battle it will enlist in ![]() KEP! |
|
|
|
|
|
#288 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Quote:
I forgot to respond to your base 19 reservation: How about I just reserve n=10K-100K for you? n=10K-250K is likely to be 10-25 CPU YEARS of work!! 10K-100K is probably 3-4 CPU years but not unreasonable if you throw a quad at it. I'm suggesting this because I can almost guarantee that you'll probably get bored with it at some point and will want to put your machine(s) on something different. (Yes, I'm speaking from experience here.) The main reason I'm suggesting this is because base 19 tests FAR slower than base 3 because you're testing bigger numbers! (duh, lol) OK...I must quit responding for today or I'll never get the pages completed or the work on my machines redistributed. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
I have removed 66 squared k's from the web pages that have algebraic factors for Riesel base 19. That leaves 1736 k's remaining at n=17K, down from 1802 k's previously. Here is a list of the k's that were removed: Code:
144, 324, 1764, 2304, 5184, 6084, 10404, 11664, 17424, 19044, 26244, 28224, 36864, 39204, 49284, 63504, 66564, 79524, 82944, 97344, 101124, 121104, 138384, 142884, 161604, 166464, 186624, 191844, 213444, 219024, 242064, 248004, 272484, 278784, 304704, 311364, 338724, 345744, 374544, 381924, 412164, 419904, 451584, 459684, 492804, 501264, 535824, 544644, 580644, 589824, 627264, 675684, 685584, 725904, 736164, 777924, 788544, 842724, 887364, 898704, 944784, 956484, 1004004, 1016064, 1065024, 1077444 In order to remove additional k's for n=17K-25K here to reflect 1605 k's remaining, I'll need to get the primes for that range from you. Edit: I just now compared the list that you sent of k's remaining to what I showed remaining at n=17K. There are 134 k's that are on my list at n=17K that are not on your list at n=25K. With that being the case, there should be 1602 k's remaining at n=25K. Somewhere something is off by 3 k's. The primes will help find where. I suspect there is are some k's that are multiples of the base (that I previously listed) or that are squared k's that did not get removed from your testing but that's only a guess. Thanks, Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-05-06 at 05:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Note: moved KEP's latest post about Sierp. base 3 to the base 3 thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
LLRnet IB6 has completed k=10107, k=13215, and k=14505 for the range n=60K-100K. No primes. lresults are attached.
![]() Edit: Oh, forgot to mention, LLRnet is releasing these k's.
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-05-06 at 17:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#292 | |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
22·67 Posts |
Quote:
I've sent the primes to you. I have it all sitting in an excel so it it easy to cough up. I didn't use the k's you posted, I was cutting and pasting myself. These are the k's that are divisible by 19 that I still included in the search: 53694 124754 132126 192014 234194 255474 265164 419444 486324 595004 640224 641136 650864 666824 928454 946124 1020186 Is that the same as what you came up with? Willem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#293 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
After a concerted balancing effort after removing all appropriate multiples of the base and perfect squares where k==(4 mod 10), I have determined that there are actually 1603 k's remaining at n=25K, which is 2 different than what you have. Here are the differences: 1. k=132126 is divisible by 19^2 and so reduces to k=366. Since k=366 is remaining, you can remove k=132126 from your search. (You had already removed k=132126/19=6954 from your search.) 2. k=641136 is divisible by 19^2 and so reduces to k=1776. Since k=1776 is remaining, you can remove k=641136 from your search. (You had already removed k=641136/19=33744 from your search.) 3. k=1020186 is divisible by 19^2 and so reduces to k=2826. But k=2826 has a prime only at n=1. So taking it further...k=1020186 is divisible by 19 and so can also reduce to k=53694. Since k=53694 is remaining, you can remove k=1020186 from your search. OK, so that's 3 removed from your search but: You are missing the very last k of k=1119866. You'll need to find out where you stopped testing it and retest it from that point (or perhaps you just missed a line when you cut-and-pasted your k's remaining that you sent to me). That makes a difference of 2 k's between you and me. You reported 1605 remaining. Subtracting off the above difference of 2 leaves 1603 k's remaining at n=25K for Riesel base 19. That is what will be reflected on the web pages. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294 | |
|
Jan 2006
Hungary
22×67 Posts |
Quote:
The last k = 1119866 is actually the conjectured riesel number. There is no real need to test that one. It just took me a while to figure out why the sieve would always remove it from sieving. Willem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
I'll remove it from the web page. So there are officially 1602 k's remaining at n=25K on Riesel base 19.Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Sierp base 16 k=2908, 6663, and 10183 are now complete to n=184K. No primes yet. Continuing on to n=200K.
Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24·397 Posts |
BTW, all base 28 k (Sierpinski) are tested to n = 100,000. I made a mistake and did not test the base 28 Riesels. You can unreserve them
I will reserve the Sierpinski and Riesel base 27 k. Base 30 is nearing completion to n = 100,000, but is on a slower PC, so it will take a little while longer. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1107 | 2021-07-26 18:37 |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3913 | 2021-07-26 09:58 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1691 | 2021-07-06 18:50 |