![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
Jun 2003
13BC16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Dec 2012
2·139 Posts |
Are you willing to share it? With mudkip's code (and a few adjustments) I only got up to 9*10^12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Jun 2003
22×3×421 Posts |
Here you go:
There is source and 64-bit executable. While in theory a 32-bit executable can be compiled, it'll lose some of the performance since the code uses 64-bit integers heavily (even where it doesn't need it :-)) This is command line executable which takes two parameters, a start and end value. It then checks all numbers (2^16*start <= n < 2^16*end). To avoid missing any numbers, the end value of one range should be used as the start value of next range. The program writes all candidates that survive at least base 64 to a file. Also the best so far are written to screen. EDIT:- I have already checked everything < 34e9*2^16 Last fiddled with by axn on 2015-04-02 at 04:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
May 2004
New York City
2×29×73 Posts |
So from these:
base = 50 @ n = 13655684 base = 98 @ n = 188893618365750 the OP answer is 50 -> 13655684, 100 -> 188893618365750. Great work ! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How many digits? | kokakola | Information & Answers | 23 | 2009-11-03 05:08 |
| 15M Digits - Just For Fun | storm5510 | Math | 7 | 2009-09-08 04:14 |
| All 10 Digits | davar55 | Puzzles | 5 | 2007-06-18 15:06 |
| 140+ digits which is better | marthamm | GMP-ECM | 4 | 2006-01-25 17:32 |
| Exponential Digits | ndpowell | Math | 18 | 2005-07-15 22:31 |