Wrong credit in P90 years?

[nngs]

Originally Posted by S485122

The credit FFT sizes are based on non SSE2 processors, they are a bit higher : cross over to 2560KB at 40250000, while in the program you find the cross over at 39500000.

Jacob

Thx for the explanation.

So people will feel their machines a little bit "slow down" (adding fewer P90 years) as they crunching in between 39500000 and 40250000

[davieddy]

Originally Posted by nngs

Thx for the explanation.

So people will feel their machines a little bit "slow down" (adding fewer P90 years) as they crunching in between 39500000 and 40250000

Yes. Best not to publicize this, or even more people will abandon
exponents in this range than are are doing so already

[nngs]

Originally Posted by davieddy

Yes. Best not to publicize this, or even more people will abandon
exponents in this range than are are doing so already

What if M45 in that region?

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by davieddy

Yes. Best not to publicize this, or even more people will abandon
exponents in this range than are are doing so already

I'll get to them...eventually...=].

So one would be better off putting exponents in the range 39.5M-40.25M on an older CPU that doesn't have SSE2 (in terms of maximizing throughput)?

[davieddy]

Originally Posted by Kevin

So one would be better off putting exponents in the range 39.5M-40.25M on an older CPU that doesn't have SSE2 (in terms of maximizing throughput)?

Yes. That would make the best of GIMPS resources, and result
in credit where it's due.