![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
16F816 Posts |
has anyone seached exhautively for primes particularly high
i have seached the web but cannot find any projects if not what would be the best method for starting this search |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
103·113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
22×7×167 Posts |
Quote:
) I had to stop at about the number 6 Billion. It only took about a day to run on a P3 400Mhz.There are some links to lists here: http://primes.utm.edu/lists/small/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3×1,171 Posts |
I guess it depends by what you mean by "particularly high". Here: http://www.ieeta.pt/~tos/primes.html, tables of pi(x) (the number of primes less than x) are given, and have been found/verified by the sieve of eratosthenes. It would be impractical/useless to write down all these primes. For instance, he gives pi(10^23) = 1925320391606803968923, which would take something like 17087218 peta bytes of storage if you wanted to list them all.
If you want to help find the biggest known primes, join GIMPS. Last fiddled with by bsquared on 2007-10-12 at 18:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Feb 2006
Denmark
E616 Posts |
pi(x) can be computed much faster than computing all primes up to x. Only some of the pi(x) values up to pi(10^23) have been verified by the sieve of Eratosthenes. The largest exhaustive computation of primes is part of the Goldbach conjecture verification at http://www.ieeta.pt/~tos/goldbach.html. They reached 10^18 in April. pi(10^18) = 24,739,954,287,740,860 is also far too many primes to store. They were only kept shortly in ram.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
2·32·17·23 Posts |
Hmm, my old account (think of years, not month) is not active any more... anyways:
I still find this text about the practical limitations of computing and saving all primes to be rather good. It starts easy, but at the end it goes into detail about the limits of todays technologies. (clustering techniques etc. and where is will fail) http://www.troubleshooters.com/codec...imenumbers.htm |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭"
May 2003
Down not across
29×3×7 Posts |
Quote:
Here's a list of primes from 14 upwards: 17, 19, 23, 29, ... I'll leave you to find the primes from 1 to 14. Paul Last fiddled with by xilman on 2007-10-13 at 09:38 Reason: Fix speeling misteaks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23×3×5×72 Posts |
so how much disk space would it take to store the first 1,000,000 primes
i have previously written a vb.net program which uses the sieve of Eratosthenes to find all primes up to 2^30 it took about 90 second to run my program doesnt work any higher than that because the index for a bitarray has a max of (2^31)-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Jun 2003
49116 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
44768 Posts |
Quote:
http://www.rsok.com/~jrm/printprimes.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
61278 Posts |
I have a file taking 285,714,288 bytes with all primes up below 10,000,000,080 using the 48 bit / 210 integers format.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finding VERY large primes | c10ck3r | Information & Answers | 34 | 2012-08-29 16:47 |
| Why arent there many softwares for finding Huge Primes | blistervol | Math | 2 | 2012-08-20 17:26 |
| Best Work for Finding Primes | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 9 | 2012-06-24 13:50 |
| Finding primes using modular stacking | goatboy | Math | 1 | 2007-12-07 12:30 |
| Finding primes with a PowerPC | rogue | Lounge | 4 | 2005-07-12 12:31 |