mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2007-10-08, 03:45   #1
devarajkandadai
 
devarajkandadai's Avatar
 
May 2004

1001111002 Posts
Default A puzzle dedicated to Mally

Mally was primarily a "puzzles" personality- he used to love solving puzzzles.The following small puzzle is dedicated to him:
The function 3^n-2 generates numbers such that their digits add up to 7.
a)Is there a simple algebraic explanation?b)Are there other similar functions?
Devaraj
devarajkandadai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 04:27   #2
Wacky
 
Wacky's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country

21018 Posts
Default

Unfortunately, you left out the fact that it fails for n < 2.

For larger n, it is very easy to prove.
Wacky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 04:50   #3
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

64110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wacky View Post
Unfortunately, you left out the fact that it fails for n < 2.

For larger n, it is very easy to prove.
and you both left out that it fails for n = 3 and n > 4

although if we consider D(x) to be the sum of digits of x and D_k(x) to be the k-th iteration of D(x), then lim(k->oo) D_k(3^n-2) = 7 is true for n > 1
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 08:02   #4
Wacky
 
Wacky's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country

44116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orgasmic Troll View Post
it fails for n = 3
3^3-2 = 27-2 = 25; 2+5=7

Why do you claim that it fails?
Wacky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 08:11   #5
Kees
 
Kees's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

22×72 Posts
Default

3^4-2=79...sums to 16, but I suppose you need to keep summing
Kees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 11:22   #6
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wacky View Post
3^3-2 = 27-2 = 25; 2+5=7

Why do you claim that it fails?
I meant to say n = 4 and n > 5, I was posting far too late last night

Last fiddled with by Orgasmic Troll on 2007-10-08 at 11:23
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 11:37   #7
davieddy
 
davieddy's Avatar
 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England

2·3·13·83 Posts
Default Irony

It would be ironic if a problem dedicated to Mally were
badly formulated
davieddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-10-08, 11:39   #8
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

64110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devarajkandadai View Post
Mally was primarily a "puzzles" personality- he used to love solving puzzzles.The following small puzzle is dedicated to him:
The function 3^n-2 generates numbers such that their digits add up to 7.
a)Is there a simple algebraic explanation?b)Are there other similar functions?
Devaraj

for n>1, 3^n is divisible by 9. In a base-r number system, numbers divisible by (r-1) will have an eventual digit sum of (r-1), so in base 10, numbers divisible by 9 have an eventual digit sum of 9. Subtract 2, and you get 7

Similar functions will probably use the same trick. 3^n-5, for example, will always have an eventual digit sum of 4. 18^n-7 will have an eventual digit sum of 2.

multiples of other digits cycle, for example, for n = 1, 2, ... the eventual digit sums of 7n are 7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 9, ...

note, this is a cycle of length 9, so if we wanted to pick out one digit and make it consistent, then we replace n with 9n + k, but then we get 63n + 7k, and the divisibility by 9 trick comes in.

so, basically, here's how you create one of these bad boys. Find some function f(x) where 9|f(x) and then create g(x) = f(x) + k. I would be curious to see an example that doesn't fit this form, or a proof that all of them have to
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mally devarajkandadai Math 12 2011-01-25 21:11
Dedicated Prime95 rig hj47 Hardware 18 2008-12-29 23:24
Mally devarajkandadai Math 2 2008-11-19 12:46
Mally's habits devarajkandadai Math 6 2008-01-20 15:38
Mally sequence devarajkandadai Math 0 2007-10-11 05:33

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:30.


Fri Jul 16 12:30:46 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 10:18, 2 users, load averages: 1.23, 1.16, 1.26

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.