![]() |
|
|
#56 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
can someone explain to my what the black and brown lines on this graph represent?
1 number? 100 numbers? I'm lost as to if this gives a count of any sort for these ranges |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Dec 2002
881 Posts |
Quote:
All bars are red with a black line around it. Two or more adjacent bars therefore make a black surface. You can get the sourcecode in Delphi and the binaries at http://home.planet.nl/~tha/overview.zip The program allows you to examine a shorter range at more detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
1010001102 Posts |
neat little program
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
Exponents above 25M from nofactor.txt 31/12/2003
Code:
Bits Exponents Change 57 0 -2687 58 268373 -9840 59 255880 -3960 60 651802 -5041 61 101901 16582 62 72542 3117 63 12419 689 64 4599 -47 65 9 0 66 125 0 67 37 0 68 9490 229 69 50 0 70 9 0 71 6 0 72 18 0 73 0 0 74 1 0 Total 1377261 -958 |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Jun 2003
3648 Posts |
sweet everything is above at least 57 bits. great job everyone! lets work on removing the 58bits now :). I've got a 3 million range right now (66-69) so theres about 80K numbers there. thats a start i guess :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
53208 Posts |
Yaay! Congratulations to everyone on finishing 57 bits. For the new year let us resolve to finish 58 bits in 2004.
Are we up to it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2·163 Posts |
well at the rate of clearing 9840 exponents at 58bits in the past 17 days, it would take roughly 464 days to get all numbers beyond 58
i'm not sure however of the size (28M vs 77M makes a large difference) and what's left, but will look later at that part |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
100101001012 Posts |
on 31-07 there were 584877 numbers at the 58 bit level, half a year later less then half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Jun 2003
F416 Posts |
if we're gonna try to get rid of all the 58bits this year, which i think is very very likely to happen, i think we should find out which users have the ranges with numbers factored only to 58bits reserved. Then we can see if there's actually any progress going on with these ranges. if not we can release them and have some other people work on them. what do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Sep 2003
359 Posts |
Ranges with exponents at 2^58:
Code:
Exponents Date Assignee 25500000 27000000 3331 03-12-03 bayanne 29200000 29600000 6261 03-11-01 garo 32000000 33000000 6598 03-11-07 tha 35000000 36000000 21168 03-08-21 Benjamin 37000000 38000000 15573 03-04-04 hbock 39500000 40000000 1693 03-04-09 norbert 42057331 43000000 21968 03-06-08 Kevin 46000000 48000000 26042 03-05-18 bhebden 49000000 50000000 7066 03-08-19 asdf 52000000 54000000 20536 03-11-04 1997rj7 55500000 56000000 13052 03-07-18 wpolly 56000000 56500000 11313 03-10-28 andi314 56500000 57000000 10514 03-05-31 ThomRuley 59000000 60000000 25921 03-04-04 garo 62000000 66000000 9 66000000 69000000 77328 03-12-18 antiroach Total 268373 |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
Thanks for the nice overview.
Few days ago I've cleared the leftovers in the 64M range. All others are assigned and I think a lot of them we will have at 60 bit at the end of the year. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |