![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2×3×293 Posts |
I thought of this today. It relies on divergent series. Enjoy
![]() Adding the negative of the right-hand side to both sides gives: Regarding the right-hand side as a Laurent series with all coefficients equal to zero, we can equate corresponding coefficients to get 1 = 0 (infinitely many times). As a bonus, setting z = 1 gives Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2007-06-01 at 06:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
cute
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
35×13 Posts |
Place where it fails:
only works for z>1. While: only works for 0<z<1. Edit: Sorry /spoiler doesn't work with /tex. Last fiddled with by ATH on 2007-06-01 at 11:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Mar 2004
72×11 Posts |
I've never seen this proof. Very unique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Bronze Medalist
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India
22·33·19 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to automate the "P-1" proof? | wblipp | FactorDB | 3 | 2015-08-18 13:16 |
| Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
| Kladner's "Garo-proof" Dylan thread | davieddy | Lounge | 2 | 2012-01-09 04:56 |
| Can Anyone Tell Me Where this "Proof" Breaks Down? | jinydu | Math | 6 | 2004-12-04 02:33 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |