![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary
5CE16 Posts |
Prove that: if n>1 is an integer, then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Nov 2005
2×7×13 Posts |
Easy, if you assume this is true:
0 != 1 Hint: Use the property of "a^b mod c" that it maps to "(a mod c)^(b mod c-1)" to start. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Nov 2005
2·7·13 Posts |
My strategy for this problem is to (try to) find a case where
The obvious one of course is the one that (ab?)uses modular math, in order to get my answer The interesting question is of course, that if instead of 3 and 2 and 1, we had a and b and c, would we always get There's another part that I wrote down that was important... I'll have to type it up lator. Don't worry, since this covers most of the problem. :) Last fiddled with by nibble4bits on 2007-05-15 at 05:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jun 2003
32×5×113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jun 2003
2×7×113 Posts |
I'll just give a hint here:
3^n-2^n==0 (mod n) is the same as (3/2)^n-1==0 (mod n) Since 3/2 does not have an integer solution for even n, even n can be excluded. Multiples of 3 can also be excluded. Prime n can also be excluded by fermat's little theorem. THink about a^n-1==0 (mod n). Last fiddled with by Citrix on 2007-05-16 at 09:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina
2×683 Posts |
Quote:
In this case it should be both 3^n-2^n==0 (mod 2) and 3^n-2^n==0 (mod n/2). But since 3^n is odd and 2^n is even, the first congruence is false so the original congruence does not hold modulo even n. Suppose now that n=pq where both p and q are prime numbers different from 2 and 3 (because those cases were already solved). Now we have (3/2)^(pq) - 1 == 0 (mod pq) Using modulo p: (3/2)^q - 1 == 0 (mod p) (1) Using modulo q: (3/2)^p - 1 == 0 (mod q) (2) From (1) we get that gcd(q, p-1) > 1, but since q is prime we get that q is a divisor of p-1, so q < p. From (2) we get that gcd(p, q-1) > 1, but since p is prime we get that p is a divisor of q-1, so p < q. So this contradiction means that n=pq (both factor primes) cannot be used for 3^n-2^n==0 (mod n). Last fiddled with by alpertron on 2007-05-16 at 12:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina
2×683 Posts |
The previous method can be extended for all n:
Let So we have: Operating modulo Since We can build a chain ordering the primes from greatest to lowest, but we will have a problem with the last prime, because it is greater than one that is already listed on the chain. This contradiction means that no value of n can be used for the original congruence. Last fiddled with by alpertron on 2007-05-16 at 13:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jul 2003
wear a mask
22·419 Posts |
3^n - 2^n is always odd, so it's impossible for even n to divide 3^n - 2^n.
For n odd, use the binomial theorem: 1 = (3-2)^n = 3^n - 2^n + intermediate terms => 3^n - 2^n = 1 - intermediate terms. I'm feeling lazy and don't want to do the necessary typesetting, but you can show that the intermediate terms are divisible by n. Hence, 3^n - 2^n is not divisible by n. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Feb 2005
22·32·7 Posts |
Assume that a set
Consider a set Note that if prime p belongs to P, then the prime divisors (each of which is strictly smaller than p) of the multiplicative order of 3/2 modulo p also belong to P. Let q be the smallest element of P (note that q must be an odd prime). Then the multiplicative order of 3/2 modulo q is 1, that is not possible. Contradiction proves that the set M is empty. Last fiddled with by maxal on 2007-05-17 at 00:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina
2·683 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|