Double-check check? - Page 2

davieddy · 2007-04-08, 02:42

THX. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

Xyzzy · 2007-04-08, 03:09

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1111

davieddy · 2007-04-08, 03:57

Thx again but but our error fields were zero (=OK I presume)
It is the field you can't remember which looked more interesting.
(Shift perhaps?)

David

cheesehead · 2007-04-10, 10:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

It is the field you can't remember which looked more interesting.
(Shift perhaps?)

Yes, the field between the residue and error code is the shift.

M0CZY · 2008-10-30, 14:20

I have looked for my exponent on the V5 server, and my result is marked as a
suspect LL test, and the exponent has recently been resent for a second
Double check.

The machine that performed the Double check was a bit unstable, and had
about 4 errors during the test, and eventually clapped out completely, so I
left it out for the dustman to take away.

My residue was completely different to the first time LL test, so it seems that
the 3 months it took me to do was just a waste of time and electricity!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Check	wombatman	Conjectures 'R Us	3	2016-08-29 20:46
Double Check	Unregistered	Information & Answers	3	2011-10-01 04:38
First check and double check llrnet servers.	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	3	2009-01-02 01:50
Here's why we double-check...	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	0	2008-02-11 19:23
Double Check P-1	PhilF	PrimeNet	6	2005-07-03 14:36

2007-04-08, 02:42	#12
davieddy "Lucan" Dec 2006 England 2·3·13·83 Posts	THX. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

2007-04-08, 03:09	#13
Xyzzy "Mike" Aug 2002 8223₁₀ Posts	http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1111

2007-04-08, 03:57	#14
davieddy "Lucan" Dec 2006 England 2×3×13×83 Posts	Thx again but but our error fields were zero (=OK I presume) It is the field you can't remember which looked more interesting. (Shift perhaps?) David

2008-10-30, 14:20	#16
M0CZY May 2005 Brutal Police State, UK 2²·31 Posts	I have looked for my exponent on the V5 server, and my result is marked as a suspect LL test, and the exponent has recently been resent for a second Double check. The machine that performed the Double check was a bit unstable, and had about 4 errors during the test, and eventually clapped out completely, so I left it out for the dustman to take away. My residue was completely different to the first time LL test, so it seems that the 3 months it took me to do was just a waste of time and electricity!