![]() |
|
|
#45 |
|
May 2004
New York City
10000100010112 Posts |
My pleasure.
I was hoping someone would suggest that this proposition could be generalized. I can think of at least two possible ways: Any convex polyhedron completely containing (but not identical to) another convex polyhedron necessarily has a greater surface area. Any closed convex planar region completely containing (but not identical to) another closed convex planar region necessarily has a greater perimeter. The first I think can be proved by an extension of the polygon proof. The second seems to need a limit proof or some topological argument. I leave both as open questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
The answer seems obvious, and when you read the solution
you understand why:))) David |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| polygons | wildrabbitt | Math | 9 | 2018-03-26 19:03 |
| Convex Optimization - Stanford Online Course | wblipp | Lounge | 5 | 2014-01-17 16:44 |
| How Many Polygons | davar55 | Puzzles | 10 | 2008-10-25 04:37 |
| Convex hull | davieddy | Puzzles | 7 | 2007-09-05 01:27 |