|
2007-02-13, 06:53
|
#1 |
Jul 2004
Nowhere
809 Posts |
Intel Terascale
http://www.tgdaily.com/2007/02/11/intel_80_core/
Performance looks good, lets check back with intel in about 5 years and see how tehre doing. 
|
|
|
|
2007-02-13, 18:24
|
#2 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10000101010112 Posts |
If you had one of those, with each core having a Prime95 instance running LL and using 24.61 MB of memory, you'd need 2 gigabytes of memory to let all the Prime95's have enough memory to run. If they were each doing P-1 Stage 2 and could use 100 MB each, you'd need 8 gigabytes of memory for the Prime95's alone, not counting the OS, etc.
On the other hand, 1.01 teraflops is ~4.16% of the current total GIMPS throughput, so it would be worth it. 
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-15, 07:35
|
#3 |
|
Jul 2004
Nowhere
11001010012 Posts |
i do tfing -_-
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-16, 17:08
|
#4 | |
May 2005
23 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD vs Intel | dtripp | Software | 3 | 2013-02-19 20:20 |
| Intel NUC | nucleon | Hardware | 2 | 2012-05-10 23:53 |
| Intel RNG API? | R.D. Silverman | Programming | 19 | 2011-09-17 01:43 |
| AMD or Intel | mack | Information & Answers | 7 | 2009-09-13 01:48 |
| Intel Mac? | penguain | NFSNET Discussion | 0 | 2006-06-12 01:31 |
