New milestone - Page 17

lfm · 2009-12-20, 04:26

I took the milestones page and plotted it. Comments?

henryzz · 2009-12-20, 09:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by lfm

I took the milestones page and plotted it. Comments?

nice

would it be possible to do similar but showing the countdown to all numbers below this point doublechecked and singlechecked milestones?

lfm · 2009-12-20, 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by henryzz

nice

would it be possible to do similar but showing the countdown to all numbers below this point doublechecked and singlechecked milestones?

I think you'd have to collect that data over an extended period of time to get anything interesting to look at. I don't see how you'd plot just the stuff there available right now.

Uncwilly · 2009-12-21, 02:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by lfm

I think you'd have to collect that data over an extended period of time to get anything interesting to look at. I don't see how you'd plot just the stuff there available right now.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://...org/status.htm and
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://...rt_milestones/ can do it for you.

davieddy · 2009-12-21, 10:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by lfm

I took the milestones page and plotted it. Comments?

I'd like to see a linear scale for the exponent.

lfm · 2009-12-22, 05:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

I'd like to see a linear scale for the exponent.

ok

davieddy · 2009-12-22, 11:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by lfm

ok

Many thanks.
We like massaging data in East Anglia.
If you close your eyes you can sort of smell the hockey stick trick

lfm · 2009-12-23, 04:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

Many thanks.
We like massaging data in East Anglia.
If you close your eyes you can sort of smell the hockey stick trick

hmmm, I thought the log axis showed some things better. The early details for one and the relative gaps in progress seemed more constant in that the double checks aren't really falling behind.

Of course the log version might seem discouraging implying progress is leveling off or something. I think it does show how far we are from the 100,000,000 bits milestonem let alone 100,000,000 digits.

Both versions are informative in their own ways of course.

davieddy · 2009-12-25, 10:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by lfm

Both versions are informative in their own ways of course.

Yep.
The straight bits of each tell a tale.
BTW I assume the hockey is played on ice.

I have a brother who lives in Calgary - Peter Eddy.
He went there as deputy leader of your Philharmonic Orchestra (early 70s).
He subsequently became a courier, and for reasons best known
to himself transports radioactive materials around.
I know it's a big place, but if you can trace him*, wish him a merry
Christmas and ask him to get in touch with me. (I've lost his details).

David

* With a Geiger counter or othersise:)

ckdo · 2009-12-28, 06:00

December 28, 2009: All exponents below 33,219,281 have been P-1 tested.

davieddy · 2010-01-07, 09:04

All exponents below 20M double checked

2009-12-20, 04:26	#177
lfm Jul 2006 Calgary 5²×17 Posts	Milestone chart I took the milestones page and plotted it. Comments? Attached Thumbnails

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Another milestone!	tcharron	PrimeNet	3	2013-08-29 06:44
Another milestone	frmky	Msieve	7	2012-04-25 22:12
Big milestone coming up	schickel	Aliquot Sequences	8	2011-07-29 10:54
New Milestone	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	65	2010-10-06 13:18
Milestone	davieddy	PrimeNet	2	2007-09-08 12:38

2009-12-28, 06:00	#186
ckdo Dec 2007 Cleves, Germany 2×5×53 Posts	December 28, 2009: All exponents below 33,219,281 have been P-1 tested.

2010-01-07, 09:04	#187
davieddy "Lucan" Dec 2006 England 194A₁₆ Posts	All exponents below 20M double checked