![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
2×33×17 Posts |
Wouldn't missing LLs still be in that report as they are unverified?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2·7·113 Posts |
No. That report lists only exponents that have at least one LL result (first time and/or DC) turned in.
I don´t know any means of retrieving the exponents that have no LL tests at all in a given range. Except, of course, the brute force method of comparing a list with all the primes in the range with the list obtained from the server reports showing all the exponents with results (LL tests, DC tests and Factored exponents), and figuring out the missing ones in the latter. But this is of course not practical, except for very small ranges. |
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10B716 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by TimSorbet on 2009-10-16 at 22:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
110001011102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
195410 Posts |
To explore a range of exponents first use the "Factoring Limits" query, if you redo it immediately with "Exclude currently assigned exponents", you have a list of assigned exponents by comparison. Next use the LL Results query, by default it excludes only bad results and results for which a factor was found. Each query can return up to 10 000 rows. If you use "Print simple text report" dif will help you compare the lists. If you use a spreadsheet lookup functions will speed up comparing the lists.
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Jul 2006
Calgary
52×17 Posts |
Looks like we have completed double checking to 19 million!
![]() ![]() Now just 20 more to 20 million ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
22×863 Posts |
Milestones page need a "All exponents below 19,000,000 double-checked." line now, I think this is a manual thing George does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3×7×17×31 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
16268 Posts |
That is excellent! Any guesses on how long the 20 19M exponents might take?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5×223 Posts |
Countdown to proving M(20996011) is the 40th Mersenne Prime: 100 as of 0538 GMT on 2009-11-26. It took 50 days to clear 100 exponents, or 1.5 times as long as it took to go from 300->200. Looks definitely like exponential decay on the rate of completion, and I would say that we'll be lucky to see this last 100 cleared by April 1, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
30568 Posts |
True.
If this rate is maintained, one shouldn´t expect the milestone to be covered before mid-April. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another milestone! | tcharron | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-08-29 06:44 |
| Another milestone | frmky | Msieve | 7 | 2012-04-25 22:12 |
| Big milestone coming up | schickel | Aliquot Sequences | 8 | 2011-07-29 10:54 |
| New Milestone | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 65 | 2010-10-06 13:18 |
| Milestone | davieddy | PrimeNet | 2 | 2007-09-08 12:38 |