![]() |
|
|
#144 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
11001010010102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3·7·17·31 Posts |
I am kinda fond of these:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2·7·113 Posts |
Quote:
I don´t expect this milestone to be completed before end of February 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
11001010010102 Posts |
Quote:
The last one to complete the DC clinches the proof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
|
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
36428 Posts |
Just got an exponent in the 31M range assigned to a core, first time test because the test already done is suspect. I bumped it up in the work queue of that core. (Stopped Prime95, reordered worktodo.txt and restarted Prime95...)
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
#149 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
647410 Posts |
Quote:
with less than 10M digits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
Jul 2006
Calgary
52×17 Posts |
I just got one of the last 4 double checks below 19,000,000. It should be done in another couple days. It looks like all previous attempts at a double check on this number must have timed out without a result since there is no report of conflicting residues or anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#151 | |
|
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
111101000102 Posts |
Quote:
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#152 |
|
Apr 2008
Regensburg..^~^..Plzeň
5·17 Posts |
these are the last 4 assignments under 19000000
Code:
18297089 No factors below 2^66 P-1 B1=100000, B2=1850000 Unverified LL C0A7AC2B03D678__ by "Trent Taufer" Unverified LL F090592DAA1CEA__ by "ANONYMOUS" on 2009-05-07 Assigned Double-checking to "bayanne" on 2009-05-07 History F090592DAA1CEA__ by "ANONYMOUS" on 2009-05-07 18455461 No factors below 2^67 P-1 B1=220000, B2=5225000 Unverified LL A825B2D95E57D4__ by "Chris Marble" Unverified LL 32E8E3078A7C58__ by "Paul Rispens" on 2008-05-22 Assigned Double-checking to "JohanSeland" on 2009-02-22 18517333 No factors below 2^67 P-1 B1=220000, B2=5390000 Unverified LL 0661AF5F081332__ by "Ars Technica Team Prime Rib" Unverified LL 189ABBCFBC341D__ by "Heinz Ulrich Stille" Assigned Double-checking to "Team_Bundu" on 2009-02-27 ;dropped Assigned Double-checking to "jccotham" on 2009-10-03 18566731 No factors below 2^66 P-1 B1=220000, B2=5390000 Unverified LL 600BAABAB09358__ by "Tom Womack" Assigned Double-checking to "Team_Bundu" on 2009-02-18 ;dropped Assigned Double-checking to "S04803" on 2009-10-03 They might have wished you had contacted them now. 18517333 and 18566731 should be done soon. I´d be happy to do the other two would take about <5 days for both of them. Apparently the server has finally caught up with them and doing a fine job. In the meantime most DC assignments are in the 22M range. I wonder why the last one was only factored to 2^66? nelson Last fiddled with by Nelson on 2009-10-10 at 16:41 Reason: changed year |
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
Jul 2006
Calgary
52·17 Posts |
Quote:
How'd you get that report? Don't snipe, let the server figure it out. There is no emergency to get it done or anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Apr 2008
Regensburg..^~^..Plzeň
8510 Posts |
Quote:
I´ve been keeping the exponent status on the last 50 or so assignments for several months. The server only displays the most recent assignments. If a factor is found only the factor is shown, not even who found the factor is displayed then. I leave it at that because not everyone should know how to find out when a user last reported results. I just think the assignments would get done in a more orderly fashion if very large queues weren´t so common. It is too easy to lose track of your assignments if you have large queues on a given machine unless that´s all you have to do. And the risk of lost assignments also increases. That was what happened while the these jobs were hanging around undone until something went haywire and exponents finally timed out. These four assignments are only a drop in the bucket of what goes on all the time. Even though older systems could then do double checks in a reasonable amount of time they very likely are the same achitecture the original work was done on. That is except for the improvements in software of course. My reading is that hopefully DC would be done an newer and consequently different hardware which in most cases is happening. The unhappy is really for those who for whatever reason weren´t able to complete what they started. I´m certain exponents will be cleared and new milestones will be reached at least as long as springtime and harvest don´t cease. So there certainly isn´t any emergency. nelson |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another milestone! | tcharron | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-08-29 06:44 |
| Another milestone | frmky | Msieve | 7 | 2012-04-25 22:12 |
| Big milestone coming up | schickel | Aliquot Sequences | 8 | 2011-07-29 10:54 |
| New Milestone | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 65 | 2010-10-06 13:18 |
| Milestone | davieddy | PrimeNet | 2 | 2007-09-08 12:38 |