![]() |
|
|
#100 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3×7×17×31 Posts |
I think that George's optimization of the way that assignments are handed out has to do with this. More slow machines are being given the higher end of the DC's. The DC machines that are known good and faster are being given the tail end.
IIRC |
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
2·33·17 Posts |
Unfortunately my preference is to search for world record first time LLs just for the 1 in 200,000 chance that I get bragging rights and a reason to buy a poster that looks like a solid mass of gray ink.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24·173 Posts |
Why unfortunately? George's optimization doesn't force people to do a work type different from what they want. He just assigns exponents within a worktype differently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
2×33×17 Posts |
I was being facetious. "Unfortunately" because world record size LLs take longer to test. However, I am enthralled by the prospect of actually finding one however slim my chances are. This is the type of work that I want to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 | |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
73610 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
53010 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
57310 Posts |
Although the post you quoted was only 7 months ago, it's history now. Read the post after that one for a brief explanation of the situation way back then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
2·33·17 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24·173 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
11100101102 Posts |
Quote:
On a slightly more positive note... it is now 898 left to prove M40 is actually M40. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·52·71 Posts |
Quote:
"Status Unproven": The number of exponents that HAVE NOT submitted a valid LL or DC test. As of today the lowest EXP requiring an LL test is in the 26M range. I am quite sure it is these columns that are OFFICAL and that feed the milestones reports. "Assigned": Current active(?) assignments in a given range. There are several reasons why there might be assignments in completed ranges and you could ask why they are allowed to remain so (but that is another topic of lesser interest to me). Personally I have had several first time LL assignments in the 25-29M range that once completed reported as completing the Double Check. So apparently someone else assigned AFTER me completed BEFORE me. No big deal the assignmed got tested twice and I got credit for one. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another milestone! | tcharron | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-08-29 06:44 |
| Another milestone | frmky | Msieve | 7 | 2012-04-25 22:12 |
| Big milestone coming up | schickel | Aliquot Sequences | 8 | 2011-07-29 10:54 |
| New Milestone | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 65 | 2010-10-06 13:18 |
| Milestone | davieddy | PrimeNet | 2 | 2007-09-08 12:38 |