![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13·89 Posts |
Quote:
awk '$2%60==51' 204394.in > 204394.out will write the 51 (mod 60) terms to 204394.out. Removing a subsequence is probably most useful when sieving just one lightweight sequence, it will have very little effect when there are 6000 other subsequences to sieve. Note that the -pentium4 builds of sr5sieve/sr1sieve process the subsequences two at a time to make use of SSE2. If there are an odd number of subsequences then eliminating one of them will have some extra benefit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Jul 2003
wear a mask
165810 Posts |
I think B2 should be between 14 and 18 times B1 for the P-1 step... then the times spent on stage 1 and stage 2 are about equal. It has been noted elsewhere that having an equal amount of time spent in the two stages leads to the most efficient removal of factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
Where can I find some more information on P-1 factoring.
As in, what are the chances of finding a factor of certain size, with certain B1 and B2 limits? Google isn't my friend in this Oh, doing B1=100000 and B2=1500000 now for P-1; about an hour per run (on the smaller numbers). But factors ARE being found :) Doing P-1 and ECM this way is quite inefficient to get numbers eliminated, but still quite some fun:) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Oct 2006
7·37 Posts |
do you have a list of all the remaining numbers
![]() it's the week end and i have some time to play with them Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2007-02-02 at 22:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
Quote:
Some 222 values remained (above 170k or so, the rest is already prp'd), 4 factors were found yesterday evening. I will send you the list sometime this evening (I hope to remember, since I have a wedding to go to first, and am not sure if I will be sober enough on return ![]() I should be able to fit in a few seconds to send though :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Oct 2006
1000000112 Posts |
you can remove this one:
204394*5^1995051-1 is not prime. took me 9 days, 0 hours and 58 minutes to test it on one core of a centrino duo 1666 mhz i will sen residues (with others ...) to the email address |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
How about giving these monsters to the regular server, but on a different port number?
Edit: Or how about an ecm server? Things would be automatically organized properly. Last fiddled with by jasong on 2007-02-14 at 02:10 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New low weight project | Citrix | Riesel Prime Search | 54 | 2014-01-08 23:55 |
| High weight k's | kar_bon | Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) | 26 | 2013-09-11 23:12 |
| Generating Low-Weight Ks | henryzz | Riesel Prime Search | 9 | 2012-04-09 21:36 |
| Low weight k's | kar_bon | Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) | 18 | 2010-05-14 08:49 |
| Low Weight 15k | Citrix | 15k Search | 20 | 2004-06-20 21:00 |