mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Puzzles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2007-01-30, 00:24   #1
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

3·373 Posts
Default Quadrilateral problem

A simple quadrilateral is inscribed in a semi-circle so that the diameter of the semi-circle is one side of the quadrilateral. (Simple just means that no two sides cross each other, i.e, no self-intersections.) If the other three sides of the quadrilateral have lengths 3, 4, and 5 units, what is the diameter/radius of the semi-circle?
philmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-30, 10:26   #2
Kees
 
Kees's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

22×72 Posts
Default

Using the fact that we have two pythagorean triangles (with the diameter as hypotenuse) and Ptolemy's equation (cyclic quadrilateral <=> AB x CD + AD x BC= AC x BD (where AC and BD are diagonals)) we stumble upon the following equation:

r^3-50r=120




PS: forgot again the way to hide, seem to have not be posting for a while

Last fiddled with by Wacky on 2007-01-30 at 11:46
Kees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-30, 23:04   #3
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

3·373 Posts
Default

I get the same equation, but with the diameter d rather than r.

One of the amusing things about this problem is the variety of ways to solve it. I have three solutions, all different from your interesting and elegant approach. However, I am still looking for a method of solution which elucidates the form of the answer.

For anyone who works out an algebraic solution, consider the generalization where 3, 4, and 5 are replaced by the variables a, b, and c. (I discovered the hard way that my algebra skills are actually better than my arithmetic skills!)
philmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 07:50   #4
mfgoode
Bronze Medalist
 
mfgoode's Avatar
 
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India

22×33×19 Posts
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmoore View Post
I get the same equation, but with the diameter d rather than r.

One of the amusing things about this problem is the variety of ways to solve it. I have three solutions, all different from your interesting and elegant approach. However, I am still looking for a method of solution which elucidates the form of the answer.

For anyone who works out an algebraic solution, consider the generalization where 3, 4, and 5 are replaced by the variables a, b, and c. (I discovered the hard way that my algebra skills are actually better than my arithmetic skills!)
You are right philmoore and there are a variety of ways to solve the problem by cosidering the value of angles from the cosine formula and then proceeding or as Keyes Has mentioned by the Cyclic quad formula which she has rightly called Ptolemys Theorem.

The correct formula is d^3 -50d -120 = 0

where d is the diameter of the circle. But how about solving this cubic and giving us a near exact value ?

In all cubics one root is rational the other two roots are imaginary. So what is the rational value? Will it be plus or minus ?

I await with bated breath as its not as simple as it sounds.

Mally
mfgoode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:01   #5
Kees
 
Kees's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

22×72 Posts
Default

silly me
of course it should have been the equation for the diameter, but I decided to use the confusing variable r for diameter...

General equation should be

D^3-(a^2+b^2+c^2)D=2abc

where D (diameter) and a,b,c are the sides. Given the symmetry of the equation it does not matter in which order we label the sides.

PS: someone kindly hid my solution, but did not give me a clue as to how.
I vaguely remember having to put bars [] around something like hide and \hide
but the exact sequence escapes me

Kees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:12   #6
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

2×1,579 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kees View Post
PS: someone kindly hid my solution, but did not give me a clue as to how.
I vaguely remember having to put bars [] around something like hide and \hide
but the exact sequence escapes me


To hide it use: [ SPOILER ] [ / SPOILER ] (without the spaces).

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2007-01-31 at 08:13
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:26   #7
Kees
 
Kees's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

3048 Posts
Default

Dear Malcolm,

Kees (although it could be used for a girls name), refers to a boy here...
A rapid look at the equation reveals that 8<D<9

Approximately D = 8.05
Kees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:36   #8
mfgoode
Bronze Medalist
 
mfgoode's Avatar
 
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India

22·33·19 Posts
Cool Fiddling by moderator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kees View Post
silly me
of course it should h

PS: someone kindly hid my solution, but did not give me a clue as to how.
I vaguely remember having to put bars [] around something like hide and \hide
but the exact sequence escapes me

Take a look at the bottom line of your post 2 and you will know who hid your Half baked solution. As is common in this thread once again it was itself half baked without the tip off like ATH's

Mally
mfgoode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:38   #9
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

28116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmoore View Post
A simple quadrilateral is inscribed in a semi-circle so that the diameter of the semi-circle is one side of the quadrilateral. (Simple just means that no two sides cross each other, i.e, no self-intersections.) If the other three sides of the quadrilateral have lengths 3, 4, and 5 units, what is the diameter/radius of the semi-circle?
diameter/radius = 2 for any circle ;)

Last fiddled with by Orgasmic Troll on 2007-01-31 at 08:38
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 08:51   #10
mfgoode
Bronze Medalist
 
mfgoode's Avatar
 
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India

22×33×19 Posts
Cool Mistaken identity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kees View Post
Dear Malcolm,

Kees (although it could be used for a girls name), refers to a boy here...
A rapid look at the equation reveals that 8<D<9

Approximately D = 8.05

Im sorry Kees as I deduced from your smiley and the avatar you have chosen both of which are decidedly feminine that you were of the opp. sex.
I am a full blooded male and a blush on either sex could be arousing to me though I am not that way inclined !

Mally

Last fiddled with by mfgoode on 2007-01-31 at 08:55
mfgoode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2007-01-31, 11:58   #11
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,709 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfgoode View Post
In all cubics one root is rational the other two roots are imaginary.
This is not correct : it should be at least one root is a real number. For instance :
x3-6*x2+11*x-6 =0 has three real solutions, i.e; 1, 2 & 3
x3-4*x2+5*x-2=0 has two real solutions, i.e; 1 & 2 (2 being a double solution)
x3-3*x2+3*x-1=0 has one real solution, i.e; 1 (it is a triple solution)

Of course if the coefficients are randomly chosen reals, most of the time there will be only one real solution and two more can be found by using imaginary numbers.

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem 2.4 MattcAnderson Puzzles 4 2014-08-21 04:40
problem I have science_man_88 Miscellaneous Math 2 2010-10-10 16:36
PSU problem? ian209 Hardware 4 2006-02-18 19:52
51 problem Neves Miscellaneous Math 5 2004-02-10 22:59
51 problem Neves Puzzles 15 2004-02-05 23:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:19.


Fri Aug 6 05:19:42 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 23:48, 1 user, load averages: 2.11, 2.25, 2.33

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.