mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Lounge

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2012-03-25, 14:01   #199
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

5·17·97 Posts
Default

We have learned a lot here:

http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=1
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-13, 00:35   #200
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101Γ—103 Posts

2×7×19×37 Posts
Default

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2402785,00.asp
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-13, 03:50   #201
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

10010010101112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
My first and still my favorite PC...it allowed so much "tinkering".
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-14, 16:36   #202
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

3×5×719 Posts
Default Firefux

Ok, so I've finally lost patience with the browser installed as standard on Linux boxes.

It's notorious for not playing well with the Nvidia drivers, and don't even think of having hardware acceleration turned on. After just too many screen corruptions, process run-aways (npviewer.bin frequently pegs at 99% or more) and total lock-ups I've installed Chrome on both machines where I need the Nvidia drivers to be able to run CUDA applications.

The up-side is that the dual-4-core Xeon is now running the latest msieve with both CUDA and MPI.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-15, 01:08   #203
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101Γ—103 Posts

2×7×19×37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
I've installed Chrome on both machines where I need the Nvidia drivers to be able to run CUDA applications.
Opera is good stuff.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-15, 02:46   #204
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3×5×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Ok, so I've finally lost patience with the browser installed as standard on Linux boxes.

It's notorious for not playing well with the Nvidia drivers, and don't even think of having hardware acceleration turned on. After just too many screen corruptions, process run-aways (npviewer.bin frequently pegs at 99% or more) and total lock-ups I've installed Chrome on both machines where I need the Nvidia drivers to be able to run CUDA applications.
What are you using npviewer.bin for?
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-15, 02:53   #205
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

224318 Posts
Default

npviewer.bin is the known runaway child: "netscape plugin viewer".
Use adblock+ ?
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-15, 03:08   #206
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3·5·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
npviewer.bin is the known runaway child: "netscape plugin viewer".
Use adblock+ ?
Is that something included in Firefox?

I am using 64bit SeaMonkey and do not have any file called npviewer on my system. I also use 64bit Flash with hardware acceleration enabled for video playback and it always works just fine with the nvidia driver. *shrugs*

But yes I do second the recommendation for adblock plus. Definitely.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-15, 07:17   #207
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

3·5·719 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
npviewer.bin is the known runaway child: "netscape plugin viewer".
Use adblock+ ?
Yes, that's the plugin.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-19, 17:37   #208
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

... I switched to using chrome (silly me, I thought, Paul might be on to something) -- and it doesn't seem to be much better resourcewise. In top, it shows 1% activity which over a few days ran up to 66 minutes of CPU which were surely stolen from some other, more important processes.

Killed it mercilessly. Now, need to search for a less hoggy hog, again.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-19, 18:00   #209
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

3·5·719 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
... I switched to using chrome (silly me, I thought, Paul might be on to something) -- and it doesn't seem to be much better resourcewise. In top, it shows 1% activity which over a few days ran up to 66 minutes of CPU which were surely stolen from some other, more important processes.

Killed it mercilessly. Now, need to search for a less hoggy hog, again.
Chrome is far from perfect and I wouldn't recommend it over anything other than Firefux. The latter can take 100-\epsilon % of a cpu-core, and frequently did in my experience.

If you come across a better browser please let me know.

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2012-04-19 at 18:01
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Happy Me Thread wblipp Lounge 1012 2021-07-28 18:04
Unhappy Me: The "dead GPU" edition kracker GPU Computing 294 2018-01-19 06:10
Unhappy in choosing prime sequence :-) pepi37 Lounge 9 2017-07-15 19:53
This thread, annoying as it is jasong Soap Box 90 2013-05-22 00:00
Deutscher Thread (german thread) TauCeti NFSNET Discussion 0 2003-12-11 22:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:24.


Fri Aug 6 04:24:55 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 22:53, 1 user, load averages: 3.16, 5.97, 5.75

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.