WE MADE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Page 8

R. Gerbicz · 2007-01-18, 16:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by MooooMoo

No. Just wait for the primes to show up on the top-20 list

Note that it will appear also on http://primes.utm.edu/primes/lists/all.txt

The previous 3 twinprime records:

Code:

 5045  100314512544015*2^171960+1        51780 x24  2006 Twin (p+2)
 5046  100314512544015*2^171960-1        51780 x24  2006 Twin (p)
 5047  16869987339975*2^171960+1         51779 x24  2005 Twin (p+2)
 5048  16869987339975*2^171960-1         51779 x24  2005 Twin (p)
 5049  33218925*2^169690+1               51090 g259 2002 Twin (p+2)
 5050  33218925*2^169690-1               51090 g259 2002 Twin (p)

Because twinprimes is an interesting type, so Chris will list them after the 5000 largest primes.

pacionet · 2007-01-18, 19:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by MooooMoo

TPS, Primegrid, eric_v, Skligmund, and gribozavr will get the credit. Also, Rytis, pacionet, me, LLR, and NewPGen will all be in the project's bio page.

MooMoooo in the list on primes.utm.edu still miss: me and NewPgen.

MY page there: http://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=874

Rytis · 2007-01-18, 20:09

We have been /.'ed:
http://science.slashdot.org/science/.../0156221.shtml

MooMoo2 · 2007-01-18, 20:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by pacionet

MooMoooo in the list on primes.utm.edu still miss: me and NewPgen.

MY page there: http://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=874

That's because I haven't e-mailed Chris Caldwell yet about changing TPS and PrimeGrid into projects, not persons (I'll do so in a few hours). Now, our proof code is - L202 : Vautier, McKibbon, Slatkevicius, Kwok, Gribenko, LLR. Once I tell Prof. Caldwell about this, the code will be:

L202 : Vautier, McKibbon, PrimeGrid, TPS, Gribenko, LLR

As I said earlier, you, me, Rytis and NewPGen will be in the project's bio page, not in the actual proof-code.

P.S. The prime has been verified, and we're now at the top of:

http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=1

Kosmaj · 2007-01-18, 21:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rytis

We have been /.'ed:

Too bad the discussion there, with a few exceptions (the post about prof. Jarai), is a total crap.

MooMoo2 · 2007-01-19, 00:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by MooooMoo

That's because I haven't e-mailed Chris Caldwell yet about changing TPS and PrimeGrid into projects, not persons (I'll do so in a few hours).

I guess Prof. Caldwell noticed the submission before I had a chance to e-mail him, and the change has been made now.

Jean Penné · 2007-01-20, 17:31

In the TPS and PrimeGrid Bios pages, I can read :

Largest prime: 2003663613 · 2^195000-1 (58711 digits) via L202 on 1/18/2007 10:06:57 CDT

But this is twin(p), so, your largest prime is twin(p+2)!!
I think you are also beating the record of the tiniest relative error, because
2/(2003663613 · 2^195000+1) is not much...

Again I congratulate all participants for this beautiful success, and whish you to celebrate soon the next twin discovery (this time > 100000 digits).

Best regards,
Jean

pacionet · 2007-01-20, 17:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jean Penné

In the TPS and PrimeGrid Bios pages, I can read :

Largest prime: 2003663613 · 2^195000-1 (58711 digits) via L202 on 1/18/2007 10:06:57 CDT

But this is twin(p), so, your largest prime is twin(p+2)!!

Also in my opinion it is strange that twin primes are not shown together (on the same line).

MooMoo2 · 2007-01-20, 19:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jean Penné

In the TPS and PrimeGrid Bios pages, I can read :

Largest prime: 2003663613 · 2^195000-1 (58711 digits) via L202 on 1/18/2007 10:06:57 CDT

But this is twin(p), so, your largest prime is twin(p+2)!!
I think you are also beating the record of the tiniest relative error, because
2/(2003663613 · 2^195000+1) is not much...

Again I congratulate all participants for this beautiful success, and whish you to celebrate soon the next twin discovery (this time > 100000 digits).

Best regards,
Jean

Eric_v's and Skligmund's bio pages have 2003663613 · 2^195000-1 listed as the largest prime too.

Skligmund · 2007-01-20, 19:55

You're right, it does! Weird...

If you click on 'This Users Current Primes' it does have both of them listed, and the correct one is ranked higher than the other.

Skligmund · 2007-01-20, 20:00

http://perso.orange.fr/yves.gallot/primes/chrrcds.html

that could use an update too... Don't know how to go about doing that, or who to inform.

2007-01-20, 17:31	#84
Jean Penné May 2004 FRANCE 2⁴×3×13 Posts	A very, very, tiny error... In the TPS and PrimeGrid Bios pages, I can read : Largest prime: 2003663613 · 2^195000-1 (58711 digits) via L202 on 1/18/2007 10:06:57 CDT But this is twin(p), so, your largest prime is twin(p+2)!! I think you are also beating the record of the tiniest relative error, because 2/(2003663613 · 2^195000+1) is not much... Again I congratulate all participants for this beautiful success, and whish you to celebrate soon the next twin discovery (this time > 100000 digits). Best regards, Jean

2007-01-20, 19:55	#87
Skligmund Dec 2006 Anchorage, Alaska 2·3·13 Posts	You're right, it does! Weird... If you click on 'This Users Current Primes' it does have both of them listed, and the correct one is ranked higher than the other. Last fiddled with by Skligmund on 2007-01-20 at 19:56

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Somebody made a numerical mistake	Arkadiusz	Math	20	2009-12-22 16:07
What every American should be made to learn about	garo	Soap Box	18	2009-09-07 10:06
You would-be sleuths made it much harder...	ewmayer	Lounge	6	2008-09-17 18:09
less v4 reservations being made	tha	PrimeNet	8	2008-08-14 08:26
Who made the new logo?	Kevin	Lounge	10	2002-08-23 00:55

2007-01-18, 20:09	#80
Rytis Nov 2006 130₈ Posts	We have been /.'ed: http://science.slashdot.org/science/.../0156221.shtml

2007-01-20, 20:00	#88
Skligmund Dec 2006 Anchorage, Alaska 116₈ Posts	http://perso.orange.fr/yves.gallot/primes/chrrcds.html that could use an update too... Don't know how to go about doing that, or who to inform.