Stats - Page 3

tnerual · 2006-11-05, 19:20

hey pay attention, you will not be able to sleep next week-end with all the work you are accepting !

ltd · 2006-11-05, 20:12

I said after the next weekend.
And the good news is that i will be at home that week.

Finaly i will be able to consolidate all the data for SR5 and also for PSP.

Lars

ltd · 2006-11-12, 08:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by tnerual

another stat question:

for external k test (not LLRnet based), when i send negative prp results (non-prime), are they incorporated in the llrnet stats or not ?

in fact i ask this 'cause i send about 870 negative results for my k (341552) and i see that the maximum tested value is equal to my max tested value. but there was no increase in "prp test done" column.

Laurent

Hi,

are you sure with your observation. I imported some results for Bananeweizen some minutes ago and the prp tests done increased as it should.

Cheers,

Lars

tnerual · 2006-11-12, 09:46

i tested 341552 up to 200000, and i didn't see any increase in my score

before first chunk: total test done: 10022
send k=341552 up to 187000 no increase in total test (+/-870 test sent in)
48 hour rally: total test up to 10736
send k=341552 up to 200000 and k=285728 from 140000 to 150000, no increase (180 test sent in)

for info: i send results in a "llrnet server results.txt" format ...

in the stats:
the max n tested for this k is updated
the #prp test for this k done is not updated
the #prp test done for this user is not updated (my case)

it's working for bananeweizen but not for me

i can mail you some more results so that you can test ...

ltd · 2006-11-12, 10:28

I know what happened. There is a small error in one of my scripts.

There is a check for the string "RES64" to recognize one of the result formats.
And there is an "upper()" missing. Your results show up as "Res64:"

I will have to check all results once more to import really all residues.

Sorry for that.

It can take a little while cause i have to check first how the error influenced the following steps so i can write a programm to correct the error without making any damage to the stats.

Cheers,

Lars

ltd · 2006-11-12, 11:08

I have checked all the manual result files and there are only two files from tnerual that have this problem.

He will be the lucky one who win lots of extra points as these results have not yet been countet in the stats.

Cheers,

Lars

tnerual · 2006-11-12, 11:35

the most important is to know that there is a problem and to know where it is ... take all the time you need to fix it.

Laurent

tnerual · 2006-11-12, 13:02

stats have a better look now ...

thanks

Laurent

geoff · 2006-11-13, 03:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by ltd

The ideal solution would be to have seperate stats for p-1,ecm and normal sieving. This is not possible at the moment as my database design does not support it and i do not have the time to change it.

Maybe a work-around would be to enter the P-1 results under a different user name. We could have a single user called Pminus1, or we could have individual user names like geoff_pminus1, masser_pminus1 etc. All the users would still show up in the same reports, but if you are only interested in the sieving scores it is easy enough to ignore the names ending in_pminus1.

2006-11-21, 20:18

if there is a simple way to combine riesel and sierpinski sieve stats i would like to see that done. if there isn't, then not.

ltd · 2006-11-22, 22:23

When i setup the stats i thought that it would be nice to have seperate stats as the original aproach here in the forum was with seoperate lists for riesel/sierpinski.

It should be very easy ( less then lets say 3 hours of work) to build some combined stats for users and teams.

If you are not alone with your request i will create something.

Lars

2006-11-12, 09:46	#26
tnerual Oct 2006 7×37 Posts	i tested 341552 up to 200000, and i didn't see any increase in my score before first chunk: total test done: 10022 send k=341552 up to 187000 no increase in total test (+/-870 test sent in) 48 hour rally: total test up to 10736 send k=341552 up to 200000 and k=285728 from 140000 to 150000, no increase (180 test sent in) for info: i send results in a "llrnet server results.txt" format ... in the stats: the max n tested for this k is updated the #prp test for this k done is not updated the #prp test done for this user is not updated (my case) it's working for bananeweizen but not for me i can mail you some more results so that you can test ... Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2006-11-12 at 09:59

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Overall Stats	Fred	PrimeNet	7	2016-02-10 14:48
CSVs for stats available + New combined stats	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	3	2010-05-31 08:13
Stats question	em99010pepe	NFSNET Discussion	8	2005-07-05 03:22
stats on 15k	jocelynl	15k Search	5	2004-01-13 15:45
P4 On Stats	HiddenWarrior	Hardware	2	2003-08-13 14:39

2006-11-05, 19:20	#23
tnerual Oct 2006 100000011₂ Posts	hey pay attention, you will not be able to sleep next week-end with all the work you are accepting !

2006-11-05, 20:12	#24
ltd Apr 2003 2²×193 Posts	I said after the next weekend. And the good news is that i will be at home that week. Finaly i will be able to consolidate all the data for SR5 and also for PSP. Lars

2006-11-12, 10:28	#27
ltd Apr 2003 1404₈ Posts	I know what happened. There is a small error in one of my scripts. There is a check for the string "RES64" to recognize one of the result formats. And there is an "upper()" missing. Your results show up as "Res64:" I will have to check all results once more to import really all residues. Sorry for that. It can take a little while cause i have to check first how the error influenced the following steps so i can write a programm to correct the error without making any damage to the stats. Cheers, Lars

2006-11-12, 11:08	#28
ltd Apr 2003 2²·193 Posts	I have checked all the manual result files and there are only two files from tnerual that have this problem. He will be the lucky one who win lots of extra points as these results have not yet been countet in the stats. Cheers, Lars

2006-11-12, 11:35	#29
tnerual Oct 2006 7·37 Posts	the most important is to know that there is a problem and to know where it is ... take all the time you need to fix it. Laurent

2006-11-12, 13:02	#30
tnerual Oct 2006 7·37 Posts	stats have a better look now ... thanks Laurent

2006-11-21, 20:18	#32
thommy 3418₁₀ Posts	if there is a simple way to combine riesel and sierpinski sieve stats i would like to see that done. if there isn't, then not.

2006-11-22, 22:23	#33
ltd Apr 2003 2²×193 Posts	When i setup the stats i thought that it would be nice to have seperate stats as the original aproach here in the forum was with seoperate lists for riesel/sierpinski. It should be very easy ( less then lets say 3 hours of work) to build some combined stats for users and teams. If you are not alone with your request i will create something. Lars