![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Will GIMPS Ever Discover 2 Primes Out of Sequence? | |||
| Yes |
|
22 | 70.97% |
| No |
|
9 | 29.03% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
Just curious what you think. Will GIMPS ever discover one prime, and then later discover another one smaller than the first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2005
1011111102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3·5·61 Posts |
I think it will happen eventually as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
I, too, think jinydu will eventually change his profile.
(Will Primeinator? -- I don't know. )
Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2006-09-12 at 06:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
22 out of 31 users guessed correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Aug 2008
2·43 Posts |
Another question that could have been asked would be:
Someday GIMPS will find a new prime that is lower than the current maximum mersenne prime, thus changing the order. How long will it take before this smaller prime is found, thus correcting the order? a) 14 days or less b) 15 days - 6 months c) 6 months - 2 years d) 2 years - 5 years e) longer than 5 years Last fiddled with by uigrad on 2008-09-17 at 22:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
91510 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
9,787 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
Quote:
(1) what is meant by "current maximum mersenne prime" -- the current M46 (so that you mean today's M46 will become M47), or whatever is the largest at the time the next out-of-order prime is found? and (2) what is meant by "How long will it take before this smaller prime is found" -- the time interval from today, September 17, 2008, or the time interval between the discovery of the then-largest prime and the discovery of a smaller one? Suppose we find M47 = 55xxxxxx, then later M48 = 66xxxxxx, then another Mersenne prime at exponent 54xxxxxx. Is it to be the time interval between the discoveries of 55xxxxxx and 54xxxxxx, or the one between discoveries of 66xxxxxx and 54xxxxxx, or the one between today and discovery of 54xxxxxx? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Aug 2008
1268 Posts |
Quote:
(2) Time from the first prime that was found above the gap (ie out of order) until all primes in the gaps are found. I guess we could still vote, since we don't know if there are more primes in the gap, but I think that most people now would vote a). Even if someone thinks that there is a greater than 50% chance that another prime hides between M39 and M46, they might not want to guess between the b-e choices, so that person may just pick a). It's still remarkable to me that we had two found so close to each other, and that it happened with 2 primes that are of prize-qualifying size. I was just trying to present that in a different way. Last fiddled with by uigrad on 2008-09-18 at 05:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
100110001110112 Posts |
deja vu
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Primes in n-fibonacci sequence and n-step fibonacci sequence | sweety439 | And now for something completely different | 17 | 2017-06-13 03:49 |
| Primes in A048788 OEIS Sequence | carpetpool | Miscellaneous Math | 9 | 2017-03-17 22:57 |
| Sequence of primes formation | PawnProver44 | Homework Help | 37 | 2016-03-19 15:43 |
| Will GIMPS Ever Discover a New Prime Through Doublecheck? | jinydu | Lounge | 34 | 2015-07-22 21:41 |
| Any other primes in this sequence? | brunoparga | Math | 16 | 2006-02-27 21:23 |