|
2006-07-02, 05:35
|
#1 |
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
M39 !!
Hey, if I see this
http://www.mersenne.org/primenet/status.shtml http://mersenne.org/primenet/status.txt correct, M39 is proven to be indeed M39! 
|
|
|
|
2006-07-02, 10:16
|
#2 |
Oct 2005
Fribourg, Switzerlan
22×32×7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-02, 18:09
|
#3 | |
Jun 2005
2·191 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by drew on 2006-07-02 at 18:09 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-02, 19:23
|
#4 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
240010 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 00:50
|
#5 |
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina
2×683 Posts |
I have changed the List of known Mersenne primes on MersenneWiki.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 05:55
|
#6 |
|
Oct 2005
Fribourg, Switzerlan
22×32×7 Posts |
I've updated fr.wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 08:15
|
#7 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
25×3×52 Posts |
Funny thing, some people had already given up on their double-checks months ago. It seems that the exponents got reassigned to omre serious testers, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 11:57
|
#8 |
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22×691 Posts |
No the exponents were not reassigned. They were poached.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 16:17
|
#9 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
25×3×52 Posts |
As in people manually entering them into their Prime95? I was under the impression that there was a system in place to prevent people from "stealing" exponents.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 16:39
|
#10 |
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.
3·373 Posts |
Has it actually been confirmed that we have two matching residues for each of the exponents recently returned?
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 19:16
|
#11 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22×691 Posts |
ixfd64: Yes by manually entering it into their Prime95. There is an anti-cheat system but it is not fool-proof.
@PhilMoore: Actually no so the thread is a bit premature. we have to wait till George comes back from his holiday on the 9th. |
|
|
|
