![]() |
|
|
#463 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
1896-1898 complete, no primes.
Taking 1902-1904. |
|
|
|
|
|
#464 |
|
Oct 2007
32·11 Posts |
1880-1888 complete, no primes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
1900-1902 complete, no primes.
Taking 1904-1906. |
|
|
|
|
|
#466 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
1902-1904 complete, no primes.
Taking 1906-1908. |
|
|
|
|
|
#467 |
|
Oct 2007
32×11 Posts |
1890-1896 complete, no primes.
Taking 1908-1920. |
|
|
|
|
|
#468 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23·347 Posts |
Taking 1920-1922.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#469 |
|
Jan 2009
Ireland
BA16 Posts |
taking 1928-1930
|
|
|
|
|
|
#470 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
Dougal
Welcome to RPS. For future reference it is easier for us to keep track of the ranges if you reserve then in order. pb386 searched his range before he became aware of RPS' efforts. Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2009-01-20 at 18:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
#471 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
1904-1906 complete, no primes.
Taking 1922-1924. |
|
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
Jan 2009
Ireland
18610 Posts |
thanks for the welcome.i understand that,im new to this so i didnt want to reserve a range before i was fairly certain i would finish it,so i took 1 that was unlikely to be reserved before i made my mind up.il be doing it in order from now on.il be goin away soon and i wont have anyone to sieve or llr test different files,i could leave newpgen running while im away and sieve some ranges for you if you wanted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#473 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
277610 Posts |
Dougal, thanks for helping out with k=17. We are very tolerant with reserved ranges and we would never re-assign a range without first sending a private message and waiting for a considerable time for a response.
Thanks for the offer to help with sieving but I am currently on target for the 2052-2300k range. I am currently at p=86.5T and expect to be at 100T before the files are required. For info, the sieving program of choice is now srsieve and its derivatives - available from http://www.geocities.com/g_w_reynolds/. We use sr1sieve for a single k like k=17 and I am using the 64-bit version which is at least a 50% faster than the 32-bit version. srsieve has a considerable performance improvement over newpgen. Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2009-01-21 at 23:24 |
|
|
|