mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2015-03-24, 11:32   #1211
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

966310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Code:
15245685683654194070528451784367735927134564102584982532265254072253746820313011591722538299058918175786099377638450142276578178842074686064451121444334808941
67913146583098242945234710034040860323734180924846788218077857823909839832664083294529021164010342768692899249006235945630154935616014528457767660874893572764737
Ok, I will do the first one, and in case that nobody works for the second one, I will do that one too.

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-03-24 at 11:38 Reason: mismatched quote tag
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-24, 14:18   #1212
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

2×883 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
The smallest remaining HCN is this C161 from 8,3+,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Ok, I will do the first one, and in case that nobody works for the second one, I will do that one too.
Be aware that 8^248+3^248 is probably easier by SNFS (difficulty 224).
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-24, 14:23   #1213
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jyb View Post
Be aware that 8^248+3^248 is probably easier by SNFS (difficulty 224).
Yes.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-24, 15:24   #1214
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

3×5×719 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jyb View Post
Be aware that 8^248+3^248 is probably easier by SNFS (difficulty 224).
Indeed. That's true of all remaining HCN candidates AFAIK because the SNFS cut-off limit is 255 digits and the smallest composites are all greater than 160 digits (~= 240 digits by SNFS). The raw data is easily available to anyone who wishes to check.

Those two were given because GNFS was specifically requested.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-24, 19:20   #1215
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

3×5×719 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Ok, I will do the first one, and in case that nobody works for the second one, I will do that one too.
As has been pointed out, it will be easier by SNFS. Are you comfortable with finding the polynomial yourself? I'm not trying to be patronizing; I genuinely don't know your level of expertise in this field. Most anyone contributing to this thread can give assistance if required.

Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-24, 23:09   #1216
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

2·883 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
I have just queued "7293_minus_5293" to NFS@Home's 14e.
I've reserved this number to NFS@Home on the reservation page. Not knowing what else to use, I did it with my own email address. PM me if you need the reservation code or address.
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-25, 03:01   #1217
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

3×3,221 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jyb View Post
Be aware that 8^248+3^248 is probably easier by SNFS (difficulty 224).
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Yes.
The million dollar question: Is yafu so clever to see that? (because certainly I am not, I was counting on an "easy" job, copy/paste the two numbers, launch "yafu @batchfile", job done. I know BB did a wonderful job in teaching yafu about SNFS, but I am still at that stage. The first number is sieving already after it went through 0.3334 ECM last night (that is, 33% according with yafu encoding). Now you two started confusing me with inconspicuous mathematical terms...
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-25, 12:14   #1218
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

97710 Posts
Default

If yafu can't produce polynomials for the homogeneous Cunningham numbers, it's the duty of the "phi" tool, which I found around on MersenneForum a while ago.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-25, 13:57   #1219
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

6E616 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
If yafu can't produce polynomials for the homogeneous Cunningham numbers, it's the duty of the "phi" tool, which I found around on MersenneForum a while ago.
Specifically, here. Make sure you grab the latest version.
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-25, 14:20   #1220
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

25BF16 Posts
Default

Thanks a lot.
On the other hand, I said that the first one is sieving, which was wrong. In the morning when I left there were only few curves left from the ECM, so I assumed that at the time of posting (from job, lunch break) it already moved to sieving. But I totally missed the poly part. I just arrived home this evening and it still has 50 hours or so of poly... Sorry for misinforming you.
I will get over it, one step at a time...
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-03-25, 14:47   #1221
bsquared
 
bsquared's Avatar
 
"Ben"
Feb 2007

DC116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
If yafu can't produce polynomials for the homogeneous Cunningham numbers, it's the duty of the "phi" tool, which I found around on MersenneForum a while ago.
yafu can produce polynomials for these. And it chooses snfs over gnfs. When I tried it just now it started test sieving between the degree 5 and degree 6 polynomials.

[EDIT}
It picked the degree 5:

Code:
c5: 144
c0: 1
ETA: 70 days 3h 11m 11s (with 1 threads)

c6: 64
c0: 9
ETA: 78 days 2h 1m 54s (with 1 threads)

c6: 81
c0: 1
ETA: 83 days 8h 56m 10s (with 1 threads)

Last fiddled with by bsquared on 2015-03-25 at 14:55
bsquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New phi for homogeneous Cunningham numbers wpolly Factoring 26 2016-07-29 04:34
Mathematics of Cunningham Numbers (3rd ed., 2002, A.M.S.) Xyzzy Cunningham Tables 42 2014-04-02 18:31
Don't know how to work on Cunningham numbers. jasong GMP-ECM 6 2006-06-30 08:51
Doing Cunningham numbers but messed up. jasong Factoring 1 2006-04-03 17:18
Need help factoring Cunningham numbers jasong Factoring 27 2006-03-21 02:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:17.


Fri Aug 6 10:17:54 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 4:46, 1 user, load averages: 3.55, 3.57, 3.76

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.