![]() |
|
|
#67 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
an idea for good polynomials that noone else had thought of. Which is why I said "teach me"; I could not find reasonable polynomials for the numbers you suggested. The numbers you suggest for doing via GNFS are within range, but there is no reason to do them *at this time*. Generally, participants prefer to do numbers that are among the first few holes. Look at the Cunningham 'wanted' lists; they are on Sam Wagstaff's website. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
40016 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Sieving finished a while back and Richard perforned some preliminary filtering before turning the surviving relations over to me.
I was able to turn them into a 5.03M matrix of weight 349M. That matrix is currently 40 hours into a computation predicted to take 323 hurs, or just under two weeks. Paul |
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
Factorization completed after 2048.45 seconds, at Fri Sep 22 08:23:07 2006 Original number had 197 digits: 98843386509177521595904605338374556546613001655483917613534171106190384350917469364953354041535092335695935657974170411872241239891377134460477922256385857005513727420340442274468415195491759667831 Probable prime factor 1 has 100 digits: 8472423314580350450217632140650154894206616336671035361679713874206239480866924866454101040705885621 Probable prime factor 2 has 98 digits: 11666483465135187963585838119336434764875738256006740572675427278475860680359350759067856017206011 More details either from Wacky or from me when I return, which ever comes first. Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
46438 Posts |
Wow, nice factors!
![]() Alex |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Sep 2002
2·3·7·19 Posts |
I know I'm not a math person, but how can the two factors of a number collectively have more digits than their original product like in the example where the original number had 197 digits and the two factors had a combined total of 198?
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Nov 2003
11101001001002 Posts |
Quote:
2,1478L C170 = p79.p91 p79 = 2690689930879440037372552876789965290601761240871891720842427997721986219162721 The linear algebra for 2,1490L is in progress. 2,1526L has been sieved. I am now sieving 5,314+. Any info on 5,311-????? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Current status | fivemack | NFSNET Discussion | 97 | 2009-04-17 22:50 |
| Considering current hardware on the status page | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 20 | 2007-05-24 18:10 |
| Current Status | moo | LMH > 100M | 0 | 2006-09-02 01:15 |
| Current status "fishing" | HiddenWarrior | Operation Billion Digits | 1 | 2005-08-19 21:42 |
| Current Status of the Cunningham Tables | rogue | Cunningham Tables | 4 | 2005-06-10 18:28 |