![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
1001101000112 Posts |
Does it have something to do with the good samaritans?
Alex |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
May 2004
New York City
108A16 Posts |
My intended solution was revealed in posts #9 and #11 --
all five elements are either the same as or based on the names of planets -- Yes, Krypton as Superman's home world was intended as a bit of levity. I think you added a few that are based on other astronomical bodies (He) or other etymologies (Te), a reasonable extension. Last fiddled with by davar55 on 2006-02-21 at 20:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
This site http://www.pantheon.org/articles/t/tellus.html provides supporting evidence for my claim, as does the Wikipedia entry which reads: Tellurium (Latin tellus meaning "earth") was discovered in 1782 by the Hungarian Franz-Joseph MΓΌller von Reichenstein (MΓΌller Ferenc) in Transylvania. In 1798 it was named by Martin Heinrich Klaproth who earlier isolated it. In old terminology, the Sun "Helios" and the Moon "Selene" were also rated as planets ("wanderers" in ancient Greek) which is why I suggested that a case could be made for including them. Ceres, of course, is a minor planet. All three are very dubious examples of the modern meaning of "planet", so I was prepared to accept their absence from your list. Kr was actually the odd one out. All the others were named after planets, it gave rise to the name of a (fictional) planet. Now, what is special about Sm? Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
May 2004
New York City
108A16 Posts |
So, now that we've made a few revolutions around the sun,
why is Sm the only one without a stable isoptope? Is it because Krypton had a red sun? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
Quote:
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samarium: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
2×3×281 Posts |
I think you have provided the response : could it be that Sm is the only element named after a person with a stable isotope.
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |||||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
769210 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
)From http://careerchem.com/NAMED/Elements-Names.pdf Gadolinium was named for Johan Gadolin From Wikipedia: Gadolinium - stable isotopes 154-158 and 160, but ... Quote:
- - - - Johan Gadolin (d. 1852) Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-07-02 at 12:56 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
May 2004
New York City
2×29×73 Posts |
Does that answer explain why Sm wasn't in the original list?
Doesn't Fermium have a stable isotope? And didn't Albert Einstein (I think you may have heard of him) have a stable isotope? Can you create the complimentary list to the original puzzle, i.e. to Hg, Kr, Np, Pu, and U? |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Fermi, I believe, was dead by the time Fm was named. Similarly Curie, Einstein, Nobel and a whole bunch of others (including Gadolin). AFAIK, of those named after people (lawrencium is named after the lab, itself named after Lawrence) only Sm and Gd have stable isotopes Of course, I may be wrong because I'm relying on memory and not Google. Paul |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some puzzle | Harrywill | Puzzles | 4 | 2017-05-03 05:10 |
| Elemental Puzzle #4 | davar55 | Puzzles | 11 | 2016-01-10 12:53 |
| An Elemental Puzzle | davar55 | Puzzles | 3 | 2007-03-07 01:59 |
| Elemental Puzzle #2 | davar55 | Puzzles | 10 | 2006-05-26 01:17 |
| now HERE'S a puzzle. | Orgasmic Troll | Puzzles | 6 | 2005-12-08 07:19 |