![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Oct 2002
France
3678 Posts |
I take this range
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Oct 2002
France
111101112 Posts |
Done
12480 exponents 191 factors found => 1.53 % Result email to George |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Oct 2002
France
13·19 Posts |
It seems my results have not been taken into account. I just check the noFactor file, and the range is still at 61 bit.
Should I resent the result file to George? Or it can take a while to be updated? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24×173 Posts |
You must be looking at an old nofactor file because they are updated on the March 14th file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Oct 2002
France
13·19 Posts |
Strange. Just download it this morning from <http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/nofactor.zip>
and do a decomp - w 45.5M 46M and all the lines are like this one: Factor=45500009,61 Should not be ,62 ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
53208 Posts |
You must have a browser cache problem. Here are the relevant lines from my machine:
rtm:/home/garo/primenet{15:24}[962]>ls -l NOFACTOR.CMP -rw-r--r-- 1 garo users 3078868 Mar 14 21:58 NOFACTOR.CMP rtm:/home/garo/primenet{15:27}[963]>decomp -n 45500000 46000000 rtm:/home/garo/primenet{15:27}[964]>fgrep -v ",62" nofactor rtm:/home/garo/primenet{15:27}[965]>fgrep ",62" nofactor | wc 12284 12284 147408 rtm:/home/garo/primenet{15:27}[966]>wc nofactor 12284 12284 147408 nofactor As you can see, these lines conclusively prove that this range is done to 62 bits. |
|
|
|