mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Cunningham Tables

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-05-06, 16:59   #122
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

There's a tasty home-range gnfs again!
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-07, 14:04   #123
bdodson
 
bdodson's Avatar
 
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu

210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
There's a tasty home-range gnfs again!
Taken by "Krone". The numbers currently listed as smallest available
are c161 and c176 (2nd). Even better, there are just seven reserved
numbers below the c176 (at least one of which is due within two weeks,
max). -Bruce
bdodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-16, 05:26   #124
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default 2,955+ factored

Fri Jul 16 07:14:19 2010 prp74 factor: 38958796555027596194834220569683521938514173251237621993999866030334910251
Fri Jul 16 07:14:19 2010 prp79 factor: 4229446125490357176066452360993989138464237773415805870583988716154685806357331

sieved most of Q=8M to 40M and 48M to 50M for 51.3M relations, 42.7M unique. Matrix was 4.4M*4.4M, solved in ~25 hours (with pauses due to summer heat) on 6 thread of an intel i7 (2.8 GHz, windows 7 pro 64 bit). Factors found in the 3rd dependency.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-16, 11:34   #125
jasonp
Tribal Bullet
 
jasonp's Avatar
 
Oct 2004

3×1,181 Posts
Default

Well done!
jasonp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-16, 15:21   #126
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

7·292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
Fri Jul 16 07:14:19 2010 prp74 factor: 38958796555027596194834220569683521938514173251237621993999866030334910251
Fri Jul 16 07:14:19 2010 prp79 factor: 4229446125490357176066452360993989138464237773415805870583988716154685806357331

sieved most of Q=8M to 40M and 48M to 50M for 51.3M relations, 42.7M unique. Matrix was 4.4M*4.4M, solved in ~25 hours (with pauses due to summer heat) on 6 thread of an intel i7 (2.8 GHz, windows 7 pro 64 bit). Factors found in the 3rd dependency.
If you are struggling because of heat you might consider underclocking and undervolting. That could provide greater performance than currently on average and save you time shutting down and booting the pc.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-16, 16:12   #127
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
If you are struggling because of heat you might consider underclocking and undervolting. That could provide greater performance than currently on average and save you time shutting down and booting the pc.
It is not (yet) my PC overheating, but my flat reaching temperatures well over 30Β°C...

I will (almost) cease my factoring activities for now until the weather gets a bit cooler. (hey, that's a hobby, and I don't want to do it at all costs...)
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-16, 20:39   #128
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

7·292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
It is not (yet) my PC overheating, but my flat reaching temperatures well over 30Β°C...

I will (almost) cease my factoring activities for now until the weather gets a bit cooler. (hey, that's a hobby, and I don't want to do it at all costs...)
Underclocking and undervolting will still reduce its heat output to the room reducing the temperature increase caused by your pc. I understand you not wanting to boil. I have done enough of that already this year.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-22, 12:12   #129
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default New Result

Here is 2,1191+ c180 = p65.p115

p65 = 37021310507568514045709078753457472746397308843224255251382376361
p115 = 6488855516387758047783108616235043210130706479966540073784107995269862901361284623441660830796154322268718245117609

The matrix took a while on my single threaded laptop..... 867 hours

2,1191- is 80 to 85% sieved. I will do 2,2166L next, followed by 5,785M
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-22, 17:05   #130
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5,393 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
The matrix took a while on my single threaded laptop..... 867 hours
Wow!

Nice work.

Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-23, 05:35   #131
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

24·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
The matrix took a while on my single threaded laptop..... 867 hours
Wow indeed! If you have a place to post the relations or can SFTP them to my server, I'll be happy to save the wear on your laptop and complete the LA and sqrts for future factorizations for you.

Edit: Compare to the latest version of msieve on 16 quad-core Infiniband-connected computers:
Code:
matrix is 15176217 x 15176395 (5554.9 MB) with weight 1592274791 (104.92/col)
sparse part has weight 1289249761 (84.95/col)
ETA 88h55m

Last fiddled with by frmky on 2010-07-23 at 06:02
frmky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-26, 13:45   #132
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

746010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frmky View Post
Wow indeed! If you have a place to post the relations or can SFTP them to my server, I'll be happy to save the wear on your laptop and complete the LA and sqrts for future factorizations for you.

Edit: Compare to the latest version of msieve on 16 quad-core Infiniband-connected computers:
Code:
matrix is 15176217 x 15176395 (5554.9 MB) with weight 1592274791 (104.92/col)
sparse part has weight 1289249761 (84.95/col)
ETA 88h55m
It is generally more satisfying to complete something yourself, even if others
can do it faster.

If I were unable to do the matrix, I would ask for help, as I have in the
past. But as long as I am able to do the LA, I will.

I work with the hardware that I have available.

While there is plenty of large iron where I work, I can not use it.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5+ table garo Cunningham Tables 100 2021-01-04 22:36
7+ table garo Cunningham Tables 86 2021-01-04 22:35
6+ table garo Cunningham Tables 80 2021-01-04 22:33
5- table garo Cunningham Tables 82 2020-03-15 21:47
6- table garo Cunningham Tables 41 2016-08-04 04:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:23.


Fri Aug 6 23:23:52 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:52, 1 user, load averages: 4.39, 4.12, 4.06

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.