![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2005
Naperville, IL, USA
2·107 Posts |
I will start these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
Again a large range with pretty high factoring depth. I'm just curious how many and what type of machines you are going to use for LMH. What's the time estimated to finish ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2005
Naperville, IL, USA
2×107 Posts |
I have an AMD Athlon 64 machine that is cranking through the M42M to 2^62 assignments in about 10 minutes each; to go to 2^64 requires about 30 minutes each. I have a P4 at work that crunches through a factoring assignment to 2^62 in about 30 minutes and I have a P4 at home that I am putting to work. I have been sending e-mail of my progress to Dr. Woltman daily; it should be visible in the next release of the nofactor file. I am willing to share the range(s) if there are any concerns about how quickly things can get processed. I don't mean to treat the list of available numbers like the Oklahoma Territory at homesteadding time. I figured that any progress would be good progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
Thanks for the information. We are looking forward to see good progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
Range seems to be done up to 62 bits - great work !
May we remove it from the list ? If you would like to continue with a small sub-range to a higher level , it would be better to open new thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
May 2005
Naperville, IL, USA
2·107 Posts |
OK. This range is complete to 62 bits.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 76.5-77M to 63 bits | lycorn | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2007-05-25 21:32 |
| 64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |
| 47.1M to 47.5M to 62 bits | James Heinrich | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2006-07-01 02:12 |
| 35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits | Khemikal796 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 12 | 2005-12-01 21:35 |
| 32.8 - 32.9 to 62 bits | MrHappy | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2005-08-04 16:36 |