![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Sep 2002
4508 Posts |
A freind of mine posted this on another board
anyidea if he could run prime95? I know that prime95 isnt very good for multi machine setups but i dont know if it being a beowolf cluster would change that or not? Quote:
Last fiddled with by crash893 on 2005-07-17 at 16:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
100010000012 Posts |
Perhaps he could join the NFSNet effort. The Cunningham (Factoring) Project is well respected in academic circles and we can always use more help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
19×397 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
53148 Posts |
Or Lone Mersenne Hunters
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Jul 2005
Vaasa, Finland
2×13 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1D7716 Posts |
Quote:
The suggestions above were made because of the P4's marked improvement in FPU performance compared to the P3. Whereas a 2.0 GHz P4 will be 6 times faster looking for Mersenne primes, it will be only 3 times faster at NFSNet or ECMNet. Therefore, your machines would make a bigger impact on those projects. Do whatever project you think is most worthwhile and fun. Back to your original question. I think that no matter which project you run, the lack of Internet connection at each node will force you into some kind of manual assigning of work to each node. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Jul 2005
Vaasa, Finland
2·13 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32·112 Posts |
Quote:
If a potential participant is unable/unwilling to make an adequate contribution, the overhead for the project to support the participant may exceed the value of the contribution. Additionally, there is the serialization question. In some respects, all projects have goals that require that each part of the process be finished before the goal is reached. If one part is held up because the contributor is "too slow", the entire project may be hurt by its inability to reach the next goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Nov 2003
1D2416 Posts |
Quote:
If you would like to run NFS *offline*, I am willing to provide source, binaries, and input data. You can send the output files back by email.... Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
44768 Posts |
Quote:
The biggest disappointment in this approach is that it doesn't use the cluster aspect at all. But so far nobody has proposed anything that takes advantage of the cluster aspect. If you go this approach, I hope that one of the servers you slave will be an oddperfect.org server. There is a "Most Wanted" server at oddperfect.no-ip.org:8201, but the large ECM level (presently 110M) is a problem for some machines, so there is also a "More Wanted" server at :8202 that hands out smaller assignments - presently 1M. William |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Sep 2002
23×37 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|