|
2005-10-31, 13:39
|
#23 |
Apr 2003
22·193 Posts |
You can submit them any time you want. But it is also OK when you send them all together after finishing the range.
Lars |
|
|
|
2005-10-31, 19:54
|
#24 |
Jul 2005
2·32 Posts |
What is the target for double check sieve before a plan merge with SOB Doublecheck sieving is to take place. I think if people can see definite targets there will be more interests. Presently, the interest seem to be down.
jaat |
|
|
|
|
2005-10-31, 19:59
|
#25 |
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
It was around 15T ie 15000G. we are at 10000G right now.
Citrix |
|
|
|
|
2005-11-01, 06:45
|
#26 |
|
Jun 2003
158210 Posts |
Can I replace the old sieve thread with the new sieve thread? Does anyone see any long term problems? Just don't want to have two sieve threads that are sticky. (Seems confusing to new users)
Citrix |
|
|
|
|
2005-11-01, 07:45
|
#27 |
|
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
I see no problem in removing the old sieve thread.
Lars |
|
|
|
 |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| S9 and general sieving discussion | Lennart | Conjectures 'R Us | 31 | 2014-09-14 15:14 |
| Sieving discussion thread | jasong | Twin Prime Search | 311 | 2010-10-22 18:41 |
| Sieving discussion thread | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 66 | 2010-02-10 14:34 |
| Combined sieving discussion | ltd | Prime Sierpinski Project | 76 | 2008-07-25 11:44 |
| Sieving Discussion | R.D. Silverman | Factoring | 7 | 2005-09-30 12:57 |
