Sieving Discussion - Page 2

ltd · 2005-07-13, 15:46

I will transfer the ranges to the new sieve reservation.

I think in the 80000 to 89000 there will be some ranges already finished with our new dat file.
For example i finish my reservations with the new dat.
But these will be only ranges around 1T in total i think.

When we are at the point to sieve those ranges i will for sure help you with the combined effort!!!
Helping is not a one way street and you guys already startet to help us.

Lars

ltd · 2005-07-13, 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by battlemaxx

So, what's the deal with the two Sieve threads?

As Citrix already said we hope to combine sieving with the SOB guys.
But to do this we must have a sieve file with the same range and also catch up with their effort of sieving with their new file (991-50M).

It was a now or never decision to change to the new sieve effort.
We are a little bit ahead with our sieving effort against our PRP effort so there is some "spare" time that can be used for catch up with SOB.
And second they are not to far away so it is still possible to catch up.

Hope that makes it a little bit clearer.

Lars

grobie · 2005-10-29, 17:47

what is the latest sob.dat file I need to be using I have a feeling I'm using an outdated one. Got it from http://www.ldausch.de/guides/sieving.html int the Getting Started / Welcome thread

ltd · 2005-10-29, 21:58

The file to be used is www.ldausch.de/test/sob50m.zip.

The link could be found at the top of the reservation thread. Sorry that i did not think about the sieving guide link. I will correct that in the next days.

Lars

Citrix · 2005-10-30, 15:58

Lars,

When you are making changes to ldausch.de

http://www.ldausch.de/download.html

on this page sobsieve.exe needs to be replaced by proth_sieve? Perhaps a link to proth_sieve?

citrix

grobie · 2005-10-30, 16:47

was wondering is this normal here, I sieved up to 10106 already, but no duplicats or out of range, nothing just want to make sure

ltd · 2005-10-30, 16:58

Again sorry for the confusion. I should have updated all links a long time ago.
But as i was the only siever in the last about two months and i know where to find the files i simply forgot the changes.

Lars

grobie · 2005-10-30, 21:16

Hi still no reply to message 17 , but now its at 10116 & still no dups or out of range, is this normal?

ltd · 2005-10-30, 21:38

Sorry did not read the post properly.

It is in theory possible that there are no findings but it is not likely at all.
To make sure that there is nothing wrong with the sob.dat i redownloaded it and the file is OK.

What parameters did you use to start proth_sieve ?

I amde a very short testrun with your range and found the following:

10100004185783 | 214519*2^2025242+1
10100006301787 | 265711*2^327168+1

So there are at least excluded results.

Lars

grobie · 2005-10-30, 23:18

Ok re d/l sob.dat and now everthing is working ok. I must of had a corrupt dat file. Darn I knew 675 Kp/s was too good

its now at 75 Kp/s. Thanks. restarted whole thing again & came up with both of your test samples.

grobie · 2005-10-31, 10:40

How often do you need me to submit my found factors? Because 100G is going to take a while.

2005-07-13, 15:46	#12
ltd Apr 2003 2²×193 Posts	I will transfer the ranges to the new sieve reservation. I think in the 80000 to 89000 there will be some ranges already finished with our new dat file. For example i finish my reservations with the new dat. But these will be only ranges around 1T in total i think. When we are at the point to sieve those ranges i will for sure help you with the combined effort!!! Helping is not a one way street and you guys already startet to help us. Lars Last fiddled with by ltd on 2005-07-13 at 16:13

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
S9 and general sieving discussion	Lennart	Conjectures 'R Us	31	2014-09-14 15:14
Sieving discussion thread	jasong	Twin Prime Search	311	2010-10-22 18:41
Sieving discussion thread	philmoore	Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem	66	2010-02-10 14:34
Combined sieving discussion	ltd	Prime Sierpinski Project	76	2008-07-25 11:44
Sieving Discussion	R.D. Silverman	Factoring	7	2005-09-30 12:57

2005-10-29, 17:47	#14
grobie Sep 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 337 Posts	what is the latest sob.dat file I need to be using I have a feeling I'm using an outdated one. Got it from http://www.ldausch.de/guides/sieving.html int the Getting Started / Welcome thread

2005-10-29, 21:58	#15
ltd Apr 2003 2²·193 Posts	The file to be used is www.ldausch.de/test/sob50m.zip. The link could be found at the top of the reservation thread. Sorry that i did not think about the sieving guide link. I will correct that in the next days. Lars

2005-10-30, 15:58	#16
Citrix Jun 2003 3056₈ Posts	Lars, When you are making changes to ldausch.de http://www.ldausch.de/download.html on this page sobsieve.exe needs to be replaced by proth_sieve? Perhaps a link to proth_sieve? citrix

2005-10-30, 16:47	#17
grobie Sep 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 337₁₀ Posts	was wondering is this normal here, I sieved up to 10106 already, but no duplicats or out of range, nothing just want to make sure

2005-10-30, 16:58	#18
ltd Apr 2003 2²·193 Posts	Again sorry for the confusion. I should have updated all links a long time ago. But as i was the only siever in the last about two months and i know where to find the files i simply forgot the changes. Lars

2005-10-30, 21:16	#19
grobie Sep 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 101010001₂ Posts	Hi still no reply to message 17 , but now its at 10116 & still no dups or out of range, is this normal?

2005-10-30, 21:38	#20
ltd Apr 2003 304₁₆ Posts	Sorry did not read the post properly. It is in theory possible that there are no findings but it is not likely at all. To make sure that there is nothing wrong with the sob.dat i redownloaded it and the file is OK. What parameters did you use to start proth_sieve ? I amde a very short testrun with your range and found the following: 10100004185783 \| 2145192^2025242+1 10100006301787 \| 2657112^327168+1 So there are at least excluded results. Lars

2005-10-30, 23:18	#21
grobie Sep 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 337 Posts	Ok re d/l sob.dat and now everthing is working ok. I must of had a corrupt dat file. Darn I knew 675 Kp/s was too good its now at 75 Kp/s. Thanks. restarted whole thing again & came up with both of your test samples.

2005-10-31, 10:40	#22
grobie Sep 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 337 Posts	How often do you need me to submit my found factors? Because 100G is going to take a while.