|
2005-06-16, 16:23
|
#1 |
May 2005
Copenhagen, Denmark
28910 Posts |
PRP/LLR clients
Hi I'm n00b and wondering which client is best to use for PRP'ing?
Which are there? Which are the fastest? Any processor-requirements and stuff like that. 
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18, 02:41
|
#2 |
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-18, 08:59
|
#3 | |
|
May 2005
Copenhagen, Denmark
28910 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-20, 19:26
|
#4 |
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
As far as i know llr36 is the newest version. At least that is the version that i use.
Lars |
|
|
|
|
2005-07-01, 08:27
|
#5 |
|
May 2005
Copenhagen, Denmark
1001000012 Posts |
What version is best for an Athlon which doesn't support SSE2? 3.6?
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-01, 13:59
|
#6 |
May 2004
FRANCE
22×5×29 Posts |
I suggest that you use LLR3.6
I tested this version on all the Riesel and Proth primes from Chris Caldwell
database, without any false negative nor error message of any kind, so I can say that it is both the faster and most reliable LLR version for now, both on SSE2 or non SSE2 32 bits PC's. Note it is a also a proof of the reliability and of the performances of George Woltman's gwnum library, Version 24.11, I am using in this program. I am beginning now to test gwnum V24.12 wich promises to be still better ! I will use it in the future LLR version. Best Regards, Jean |
|
|
|
|
2005-07-01, 15:26
|
#7 |
|
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
I am testing prp2412.exe at the moment and it it is around 5% faster then llr36 on my P4 systems.
Lars |
|
|
|
|
2005-07-05, 00:46
|
#8 |
Nov 2002
43 Posts |
Does HT-enabled change anything on with the various clients?
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-05, 15:02
|
#9 |
|
Apr 2003
11000001002 Posts |
I have a 2.4GHz P4 without HT and a 3.0GHz P4 with HT and for both the fastest Client is PRP24xx.exe (At the moment 2413).
Lars |
|
|
|
|
2005-07-05, 20:22
|
#10 | |
|
Nov 2002
43 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-05, 21:01
|
#11 |
|
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
The HT proc isn't faster per core but the overall output is higher when you run two different projects.
For example when i run PRP and the "eulernet" project together on the HT machine i have the performance of 1.4*3GHz none HT processors. Lars |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NFS@Home errors from clients | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 0 | 2015-09-30 14:20 |
| Thin Clients | moo | Hardware | 0 | 2006-11-14 06:30 |
| MacOS X clients and PrimeNet | schneelocke | Software | 9 | 2005-12-31 02:55 |
| Non-Prime95 clients talking to PrimeNet... can it be done? | GP2 | PrimeNet | 12 | 2003-11-30 17:34 |
| Factoring performance on different clients | koekie | Software | 1 | 2003-10-16 14:35 |
