PRP/LLR clients

OmbooHankvald · 2005-06-16, 16:23

Hi I'm n00b and wondering which client is best to use for PRP'ing?
Which are there? Which are the fastest? Any processor-requirements and stuff like that.

Citrix · 2005-06-18, 02:41

LLR4 is the fastest one.

www.mersenne.org/gimps/

Citrix

OmbooHankvald · 2005-06-18, 08:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Citrix

LLR4 is the fastest one.

www.mersenne.org/gimps/

Citrix

Ehh... Where is the LLR4? I only see llr35 and llr36??

ltd · 2005-06-20, 19:26

As far as i know llr36 is the newest version. At least that is the version that i use.

Lars

OmbooHankvald · 2005-07-01, 08:27

What version is best for an Athlon which doesn't support SSE2? 3.6?

Jean Penné · 2005-07-01, 13:59

I tested this version on all the Riesel and Proth primes from Chris Caldwell
database, without any false negative nor error message of any kind, so I
can say that it is both the faster and most reliable LLR version for now,
both on SSE2 or non SSE2 32 bits PC's.

Note it is a also a proof of the reliability and of the performances of
George Woltman's gwnum library, Version 24.11, I am using in this program.

I am beginning now to test gwnum V24.12 wich promises to be still better !
I will use it in the future LLR version.

Best Regards,

Jean

ltd · 2005-07-01, 15:26

I am testing prp2412.exe at the moment and it it is around 5% faster then llr36 on my P4 systems.

Lars

battlemaxx · 2005-07-05, 00:46

Does HT-enabled change anything on with the various clients?

ltd · 2005-07-05, 15:02

I have a 2.4GHz P4 without HT and a 3.0GHz P4 with HT and for both the fastest Client is PRP24xx.exe (At the moment 2413).

Lars

battlemaxx · 2005-07-05, 20:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by ltd

I have a 2.4GHz P4 without HT and a 3.0GHz P4 with HT and for both the fastest Client is PRP24xx.exe (At the moment 2413).

Lars

Any performance differences between the two? Does HT make a difference? I know it doesn't with the GIMPS client.

ltd · 2005-07-05, 21:01

The HT proc isn't faster per core but the overall output is higher when you run two different projects.
For example when i run PRP and the "eulernet" project together on the HT machine i have the performance of 1.4*3GHz none HT processors.

Lars

2005-06-16, 16:23	#1
OmbooHankvald May 2005 Copenhagen, Denmark 17² Posts	PRP/LLR clients Hi I'm n00b and wondering which client is best to use for PRP'ing? Which are there? Which are the fastest? Any processor-requirements and stuff like that.

2005-07-01, 13:59	#6
Jean Penné May 2004 FRANCE 1001000101₂ Posts	I suggest that you use LLR3.6 I tested this version on all the Riesel and Proth primes from Chris Caldwell database, without any false negative nor error message of any kind, so I can say that it is both the faster and most reliable LLR version for now, both on SSE2 or non SSE2 32 bits PC's. Note it is a also a proof of the reliability and of the performances of George Woltman's gwnum library, Version 24.11, I am using in this program. I am beginning now to test gwnum V24.12 wich promises to be still better ! I will use it in the future LLR version. Best Regards, Jean

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NFS@Home errors from clients	pinhodecarlos	NFS@Home	0	2015-09-30 14:20
Thin Clients	moo	Hardware	0	2006-11-14 06:30
MacOS X clients and PrimeNet	schneelocke	Software	9	2005-12-31 02:55
Non-Prime95 clients talking to PrimeNet... can it be done?	GP2	PrimeNet	12	2003-11-30 17:34
Factoring performance on different clients	koekie	Software	1	2003-10-16 14:35

2005-06-18, 02:41	#2
Citrix Jun 2003 5×317 Posts	LLR4 is the fastest one. www.mersenne.org/gimps/ Citrix

2005-06-20, 19:26	#4
ltd Apr 2003 2²×193 Posts	As far as i know llr36 is the newest version. At least that is the version that i use. Lars

2005-07-01, 08:27	#5
OmbooHankvald May 2005 Copenhagen, Denmark 17² Posts	What version is best for an Athlon which doesn't support SSE2? 3.6?

2005-07-01, 15:26	#7
ltd Apr 2003 1404₈ Posts	I am testing prp2412.exe at the moment and it it is around 5% faster then llr36 on my P4 systems. Lars

2005-07-05, 00:46	#8
battlemaxx Nov 2002 101011₂ Posts	Does HT-enabled change anything on with the various clients?

2005-07-05, 15:02	#9
ltd Apr 2003 304₁₆ Posts	I have a 2.4GHz P4 without HT and a 3.0GHz P4 with HT and for both the fastest Client is PRP24xx.exe (At the moment 2413). Lars

2005-07-05, 21:01	#11
ltd Apr 2003 2²×193 Posts	The HT proc isn't faster per core but the overall output is higher when you run two different projects. For example when i run PRP and the "eulernet" project together on the HT machine i have the performance of 1.4*3GHz none HT processors. Lars