![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
May 2005
65816 Posts |
This is a CG (Newcastle) core with 512 kB L2 cache.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
May 2005
23×7×29 Posts |
This is new E3 (Venice) core with 512 kB L2 cache, overclocked to 2520 MHz.
It looks like improvement over 24.11 is slightly smaller than with older A64 core... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Jul 2004
Nowhere
80910 Posts |
When running I had my music players closed and im clients off so total processes running was 40 there was still 500 megs of ram left to use.
System= Intel pentium 4 proc clocked at 1.8 ghz northwood core socted 478 fsb=400mhz Not oced. 768 ddr 2100 ram Intel motherboard d845dbv Here are my benchmarks Quote:
Quote:
Just a little edit Seams like my system doesnt even stack up to the newer faster systems. ;) George if you need testing on intel celerions or semprons or pentium 3s tell me. Last fiddled with by moo on 2005-06-09 at 18:18 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Aug 2002
Carlsbad, Calif.
458 Posts |
Here are my results.
[Thu Jun 09 06:31:46 2005] Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm That web page also contains instructions on how your results can be included. Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.93GHz CPU speed: 2926.18 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: unknown L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: unknown L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 15.201 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 18.425 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 20.765 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 25.404 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 30.606 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 37.832 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 41.821 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 56.317 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 69.028 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 88.251 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 94.696 ms. One question: Why am I told on the Benchmark Page my current 10-million-digit test will take 108+ days when Prime95 is telling me it'll take 32 1/2 (or 108 x log 2)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Jul 2004
3510 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany
111110 Posts |
*hehe* well done
improvements are a bit less when i run 2 clients on my (memory bandwidth-limited) dual Xeon 2.2GHz 400MHz FSB. Speedup from 24.11 to 24.12 for 768K FFT (this machine does double-checks so 768K is the size which cares right now): 1 client, other CPU idle: + ~2.3% 2 clients: a bit less than 2% faster than before George: can you change the output of "Per iteration time" of mprime from "x.xxx sec" to e.g. "xxx.xxx msecs"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Jan 2003
7×29 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
26·23 Posts |
The full benchies on a PIV Northwood. A gain of roughly 4-5% from 23.8
.Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz CPU speed: 3503.12 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 32-bit version 24.12, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 4K FFT length: 0.064 ms. Best time for 5K FFT length: 0.083 ms. Best time for 6K FFT length: 0.101 ms. Best time for 7K FFT length: 0.132 ms. Best time for 8K FFT length: 0.133 ms. Best time for 10K FFT length: 0.192 ms. Best time for 12K FFT length: 0.237 ms. Best time for 14K FFT length: 0.296 ms. Best time for 16K FFT length: 0.308 ms. Best time for 20K FFT length: 0.390 ms. Best time for 24K FFT length: 0.479 ms. Best time for 28K FFT length: 0.611 ms. Best time for 32K FFT length: 0.636 ms. Best time for 40K FFT length: 0.813 ms. Best time for 48K FFT length: 1.013 ms. Best time for 56K FFT length: 1.234 ms. Best time for 64K FFT length: 1.377 ms. Best time for 80K FFT length: 1.887 ms. Best time for 96K FFT length: 2.334 ms. Best time for 112K FFT length: 2.877 ms. Best time for 128K FFT length: 3.058 ms. Best time for 160K FFT length: 3.706 ms. Best time for 192K FFT length: 4.614 ms. Best time for 224K FFT length: 5.424 ms. Best time for 256K FFT length: 6.172 ms. Best time for 320K FFT length: 7.722 ms. Best time for 384K FFT length: 9.551 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 11.261 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 12.625 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 16.279 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 20.138 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.665 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.488 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 33.920 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 41.896 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 49.281 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 55.321 ms. Best time for 2560K FFT length: 73.093 ms. Best time for 3072K FFT length: 92.949 ms. Best time for 3584K FFT length: 108.441 ms. Best time for 4096K FFT length: 125.086 ms. Best time for 5120K FFT length: 153.703 ms. Best time for 6144K FFT length: 197.016 ms. Best time for 7168K FFT length: 234.491 ms. Best time for 8192K FFT length: 271.404 ms. Best time for 10240K FFT length: 355.877 ms. Best time for 12288K FFT length: 469.791 ms. Best time for 14336K FFT length: 603.695 ms. Best time for 16384K FFT length: 746.396 ms. Best time for 20480K FFT length: 990.379 ms. [Fri Jun 10 20:32:27 2005] Best time for 24576K FFT length: 1250.233 ms. Best time for 28672K FFT length: 1580.596 ms. Best time for 32768K FFT length: 1846.726 ms. Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 8.224 ms. Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 8.264 ms. Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 8.200 ms. Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 8.262 ms. Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 9.033 ms. Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 9.055 ms. Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 11.011 ms. Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 10.962 ms. Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 10.967 ms. Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 10.941 ms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
26×23 Posts |
Just out of curiosity:
What will be the intended use for the large FFT sizes? We are still far from the 4096K limit... Is it for added precision or just a future proofing operation? |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Sep 2002
22·3 Posts |
As Kaboom had mentioned earlier in the thread, will there be a 64 bit client for Windows XP x64 Edition? I have been using 24.11 x64, but switched to this version and have noticed a slight speed increase even though it is 32... not sure about factoring though.
Curious as to why the exe is 4MB now as well... Dave - penguin22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Jul 2004
Nowhere
809 Posts |
there is 64 bit code running around someware i forgot were it should be in a post. Also its larger becase of extra new code for new processers i belive.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LLR beta Version 3.8.13 (deprecated) | Jean Penné | Software | 111 | 2015-01-26 21:41 |
| Prime95 beta version 28.4 | Prime95 | Software | 20 | 2014-03-02 02:51 |
| Prime95 beta version 28.3 | Prime95 | Software | 68 | 2014-02-23 05:42 |
| Early Beta of version 24.11 | Prime95 | Software | 113 | 2005-05-24 17:05 |
| Beta version of PRP | Prime95 | PSearch | 15 | 2004-09-17 19:21 |