![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2005
Ottawa, Canada, ON
52 Posts |
Here's what I've done so far:
1. Ran Memtest twice, going thru all 9 steps. Took more than an hour. No problem (even though to be more conclusive, it should have run much longer). 2. Ran Prime95 Torture Test - Blend test < 1 min before hardware error message 3. Ran Prime95 Torture Test - Small FFTs < 13 min before hardware error message Thinking that either of my Samsung PC2700 512MB RAM sticks were damaged, I decided to test them seperately. 1. Dimm 1: ran Blend for 12 minutes without any problems (Beat the 1 minute record when having both dimms in). 2. Dimm 2: ran Blend for 8 minutes without any problems (Beat the 1 minute record when having both dimms in). 3. Switched both dimms in slot 2 and 3 (they were in slot 1 and 3 before individual tests). 4. Ran Prime95 Blend and got a hardware error < 2 min Automatically, my motherboard runs both of my twin dimms in dual channel mode, whereas individual dimms are run using single channel mode. I'm thinking that it's the dual channel that is making Prime95 display the hardware error message. My system specs: Athlon XP 3000+ (stock speeds) Asus A7N8X Deluxe BIOS 1007 2x512 MB PC2700 Samsung RAM Geforce 3 Ti 200 Soundblaster Live value NEC 3250A Dual Layer Burner 2x120GB 8MB 7200RPM SATA Maxtor HD 1x60GB 2MB 7200RPM Quantum LM HD BIOS: Optimal settings (vs. aggressive) -FSB 167Mhz -2.5-3-3-7 CAS Timings Motherboard Monitor 5 screen capture Would you think that its the dual channel that is creating the hardware error? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jul 2004
Nowhere
809 Posts |
try setting it to single channel mode for mem also relax mem timeings try again then. also try one stick then other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mar 2005
Ottawa, Canada, ON
52 Posts |
As I said, I did try individual sticks, which indicated that it worked. It was only when I put both of them, in dual channel, that it didn't work. I appologize for not being clearer.
I'll have to check to see what is needed for running them in single channel. BIOS setting I figure. Could you suggest a better timming in order to give me a hint of what to change (newbie in CAS interpretations). Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oct 2004
52910 Posts |
Memtest86 speeds report should indicate that mem is in single/dual channel config by what the throughput speed is. From what you posted I don't think you yet tried BOTH mem modules BUT in the slots to still give single channel (as opposed to the particular physical slots you must pair up for dual channel). Does THAT work? ie both modules single channel.
Possible make sure ALL your ram sockets are clean of dust etc. My suggestion would be to slightly increase your RAM voltage if your mobo bios settings support doing this. The reason is that supplying a given voltage, with one chip is ok, but when you have two in the load is greater which may cause a very slight voltage drop. This could be enough to change operation from stable to borderline. Last fiddled with by Peter Nelson on 2005-03-25 at 16:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mar 2005
Ottawa, Canada, ON
52 Posts |
Well, having 2 dimms in slot 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 runs the memory in dual channel. Which is what Memtest ran under without any hitch. I never tried individual dimms in Memtest just because both, in dual channel, worked.
Now, I have them in slot 1 and 2 which runs them in single channel (BIOS cleaerly indicates this as well as the manual) Other info on my system: CPUZ's CPU Info CPUZ's Memory Info I'll check for dust in the case and will clean the slots with compressed air. Will check the RAM voltages too. Thanks for the tip! So, the new CPU would suck more energy than the old one, thus robbing the memory of some power? I tried Prime95 having both dimms in single channel mode (slot 1 and 2) and it still gave me the error message. So, having both dimms in, either dual or single channel, seems to cause instability in my system... Note: 3 times this morning, the case temps have gone from 26C to 106C? MM5 freaks out and stuff... Last fiddled with by thermalMan on 2005-03-25 at 18:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Jul 2004
Nowhere
809 Posts |
hmm try turning off mbm5 for a bit and run prime95 wonder if its causeing errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mar 2005
Ottawa, Canada, ON
52 Posts |
Thanks for the hint! I just tried it without MM5 running:
FATAL ERROR: Resulting wum was -3.914402764883792e+028, expected: 9.6197848261e+016 Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. Torture Test ran 0 minutes - 1 error, 0 warnings. Execution halted. This is the error message that I get across the board in all my test... just different numbers maybe. Last fiddled with by thermalMan on 2005-03-25 at 18:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Mar 2005
Ottawa, Canada, ON
52 Posts |
I increased the "DDR Reference Voltage" from 2.6V to 2.7. I then booted and ran Prim95. As soon as I got in the app, it rebooted my whole system. I guess that wasn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
Do you have an adequate power supply? I think you need at least a 300 W unit.
Is your system stable when not running GIMPS? What kind of heat-sink do you use? What's your CPU temperature under the full load? 52C appearing in your MBM screen capture sounds too low for a full load temp... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Sep 2002
2×331 Posts |
Try underclocking your CPU to half speed and running the tests.
This will reduce heat and power usage by the CPU. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jan 2003
3138 Posts |
Try using slower memory timings. Perhaps 3-4-4-8 and see if it stabilises.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is the problem here? | didgogns | Msieve | 1 | 2016-11-15 03:31 |
| problem 2.4 | MattcAnderson | Puzzles | 4 | 2014-08-21 04:40 |
| Problem with LMH | derekg | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2007-02-26 22:47 |
| 51 problem | Neves | Miscellaneous Math | 5 | 2004-02-10 22:59 |
| 51 problem | Neves | Puzzles | 15 | 2004-02-05 23:11 |