mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2005-10-26, 18:18   #34
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2·53·71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu
So why the bias against trial factoring?
There is no bias against trial factoring. You are credited, to the best of our ability, with the CPU time you actually used.

In v5, we'll probably revisit the formula to bring it up-to-date.

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2005-10-26 at 18:19
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-10-27, 07:18   #35
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22×691 Posts
Default

Ah! So when the Primenet server was first designed, computers were much better at TF relative to LL testing than they are now. Seems obvious since George has improved the LL testing code so many times whereas TF has only undergone a few revisions.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-21, 22:04   #36
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

110110111102 Posts
Default

I haven't seen this in a long time (if ever, I don't quite remember):

The virtual machine's sustained throughput* is currently 20305 billion floating point operations per second (gigaflops), or 1686.8 CPU years (Pentium 90Mhz) computing time per day. For the testing of Mersenne numbers, this is equivalent to 725 Cray T916 supercomputers, or 362.5 of Cray's most powerful T932 supercomputers, at peak power. As such, PrimeNet ranks among the most powerful computers in the world. (*Measured in calibrated P5 90Mhz, 32.98 MFLOP units: 25658999 FPO / 0.778s using 256k FFT.)
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-22, 23:27   #37
ninjabill
 
ninjabill's Avatar
 
Jan 2006

22·3 Posts
Default

Hi there, what would be the output of a P4 in flops / mhz? Am I being deeply dim, and the answer is 1,000,000, or is the calculation a little more in depth?
ninjabill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 00:33   #38
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2·3·293 Posts
Default

The answer is not 1,000,000. In reality, the answer depends on how fast the other parts of your computer run.

I'm sure there are others in this forum who could answer that question much better than I can, so I'll leave it to them.
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 08:07   #39
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

505110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninjabill
Hi there, what would be the output of a P4 in flops / mhz? Am I being deeply dim, and the answer is 1,000,000, or is the calculation a little more in depth?
P4 (and AMD Athlon/Athlon 64) can sustain 2 FLOP / cycle. However, this is the theoretical peak output.
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 12:10   #40
ninjabill
 
ninjabill's Avatar
 
Jan 2006

22×3 Posts
Default

So is it possible to calcualte how many P90 cpu years/day throughput you get from a P4 running at n Mhz?

regards

geoff (maths numpty)
ninjabill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 13:03   #41
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,051 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninjabill
So is it possible to calcualte how many P90 cpu years/day throughput you get from a P4 running at n Mhz?
If only it were that simple

The actual thruput will be affected by
  • L2 Cache size
  • L2 Cache latency
  • FSB speed
  • Memory speed
  • Exponent being tested (FFT size used)
  • etc...
Also, performance doesn't scale linearly with MHz.

OTOH, given an exponent and a particular machine, you can quickly calculate the P90 CPU years/day easily.

Just run a benchmark for the exponent and note down the iteration time. Then go to this page and figure out the corresponding iteration time for a PII-400.
Then your machine's P90 CPU yrs/day = <PII-400 iter time> * 5.5 / <Your iter time> / 365
Simple, isn't it?
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 15:08   #42
ninjabill
 
ninjabill's Avatar
 
Jan 2006

22×3 Posts
Default

Thanks for that, I seem to be getting about 97 P90 years/year in a P4 3.0 (530 with HT disabled) does this value sound about right?

thanks

geoff
ninjabill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 16:18   #43
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

33368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn1
Also, performance doesn't scale linearly with MHz.
It doesn't? Is the second derivative positive or negative?
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-01-23, 18:14   #44
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,051 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninjabill
Thanks for that, I seem to be getting about 97 P90 years/year in a P4 3.0 (530 with HT disabled) does this value sound about right?
Sounds about right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu
It doesn't? Is the second derivative positive or negative?
If we plot efficiency (Actual thruput/theoretical thruput) as a function of frequency, we'll see that efficiency drops as frequency goes higher. Does that answer your question? Linear scaling would mean that efficiency would remain constant irrespective of frequency.

PS:- All of this assumes that all other things (FSB, cache, etc...) remain the same.

Last fiddled with by axn on 2006-01-23 at 18:14
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
v4 computers hrdubwd Information & Answers 0 2013-03-17 14:08
cannot merge computers Unregistered Information & Answers 2 2012-04-18 21:26
V4 Computers MurrayInfoSys Information & Answers 3 2009-05-17 13:52
And the hits just keep on coming..... R.D. Silverman Factoring 13 2005-10-04 10:02
Getting more computers Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 2 2005-09-07 13:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:57.


Fri Jul 16 21:57:58 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 19:45, 2 users, load averages: 2.20, 2.10, 2.00

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.