Something odd(max n listed as 199950, not 200000)

jasong · 2005-03-12, 21:08

Guys, I'm positive I entered 200,000 as the max n when I began sieving, but the sieving program and the generated file both listed the max n as 199950.

If I don't find a prime, or quit early, what should I list as being checked, 200000 or 199950? If I don't get a satisfactory answer, I'll simply assume it's best to post 199950.

Thanks

Mystwalker · 2005-03-12, 21:16

I guess all n's between 199,950 and 200,000 have been sieved out. There is no need to further sieve in that range. You can report 200k as the upper bound.

jasong · 2005-03-12, 22:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystwalker

I guess all n's between 199,950 and 200,000 have been sieved out. There is no need to further sieve in that range. You can report 200k as the upper bound.

That's what I think. Can anyone confirm this theory?

2005-03-12, 21:08	#1
jasong "Jason Goatcher" Mar 2005 3·7·167 Posts	Something odd(max n listed as 199950, not 200000) Guys, I'm positive I entered 200,000 as the max n when I began sieving, but the sieving program and the generated file both listed the max n as 199950. If I don't find a prime, or quit early, what should I list as being checked, 200000 or 199950? If I don't get a satisfactory answer, I'll simply assume it's best to post 199950. Thanks

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why is that Factor not listed ?	Kalli Hofmann	Math	4	2017-01-13 08:59
Post 200000	Raman	Lounge	19	2016-10-07 06:17
M47 not listed in LL results page	Dubslow	PrimeNet	7	2011-12-22 05:48
what does it take to get listed on major news agencies?	ixfd64	Lounge	76	2004-01-05 23:25

2005-03-12, 21:16	#2
Mystwalker Jul 2004 Potsdam, Germany 33F₁₆ Posts	I guess all n's between 199,950 and 200,000 have been sieved out. There is no need to further sieve in that range. You can report 200k as the upper bound.