![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2003
30568 Posts |
Good news finally!
Found a new prime 241489*2^1365062+1 is prime! Found and verified using llrnet and llr 3.5. Waiting for the database to confirm it. Though both tests were done on the same computer. weight of k=150, so not bad Rank=23 provers code =L101 Hope the next prime comes soon! Citrix PS: Lars, All the values for this k need to be updated but do not update the values for this k for my files, since all k/n pairs for this k have been sent to the LLR net clients, so I will be doing them in any case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2·53·71 Posts |
Congratulations!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
1110100110112 Posts |
Congratulations Citrix -- a big find
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
24416 Posts |
Congratulations, I am very happy to learn of this result!
I whish many further sucesses for you and for the project. Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
Great news!
![]() Congratulations, Citrix! ![]() Maybe this project becomes more attractive now. And new dat files speed up sieving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Sep 2004
1011000011102 Posts |
Nice found!
![]() I agree with Mystwalker, it's time to update the SOB.dat file. Carlos Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2005-01-24 at 18:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mar 2004
3×13 Posts |
Congrats Citrix!
(and all the sievers) I think a prime for PSP was well over due.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
Thanks to everyone involved in the project, especially the sievers as footmaster pointed out, I don't think I would have been able to find the prime, working by myself.
It is taking too long for primes.utm.edu to confirm the prime. It took me about 2 hrs to confirm the prime. Citrix Footmaster, the llrnet server seems to be down, I am unable to connect to it for few days, could you look into it and also update your the files for this k for the candidates that have not been sent out yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Jun 2003
158210 Posts |
I would also like to mention here that our next prime should be found much sooner. Since we will be switching to LLRnet 3.5, which is 4 times faster than the current version, in about a weeks time. Currently me and ltd is doing some testing to make a sure that it doesnot have any bugs, once this is solved, we should find several primes really fast, and you could be one of them to find them.
Secondly, I have been asked about a network sieve client. There is a way to use the exisiting client as a network client, but it is complicated and you will have to have an expertise in networking concepts. if intrested, let me know and I will help you out, in terms of setting the client. Citrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3·277 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jun 2003
2×7×113 Posts |
keep track of which program was used for which residue and use that in the future for double testing.
Since the new LLR is 4 times faster, it might be better to do 2 double checks with the new client instead of using the old client. Citrix
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
| Twin Prime Days, Prime Day Clusters | cuBerBruce | Puzzles | 3 | 2014-12-01 18:15 |
| disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD? | emily | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-03-01 05:49 |
| Prime Cullen Prime, Rest in Peace | hhh | Prime Cullen Prime | 4 | 2007-09-21 16:34 |
| The 40th known Mersenne prime, 220996011-1 is not PRIME! | illman-q | Miscellaneous Math | 33 | 2004-09-19 05:02 |